Contacting Rachel Maddow

submitted by BEB from twitter.com

all 12 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]BEB[S] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

I think Maddow fans should contact her. Even though I personally think Maddow is an egotistical blowhard (and I've met her), she's an out "liberal" lesbian.

Of course, TransBC backed by Big Pharma $$$ would never let an MSNBC host do a GC-sympathetic show, but at least Maddow would know that there are growing numbers of her fans who are openly revolting against gender madness.

[–]MarkTwainiac 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

MSNBC is owned by NBC, which is owned by NBC Universal, which in turn is owned by Comcast.

People in Maddow's position are not journalists, independent thinkers or skeptical of the party line all the woke ascribe to. They are corporate lackeys, talking heads hired to present a particular POV. If Maddow had a shred of scruples left, she wouldn't be in her job.

NBC News and NBC Universal are very, very pro-trans ideology.

[–]BEB[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Here is my thought: As we've seen with the ACLU, which is being ridiculed for its recent TiMs in sports tweets, gender ideology does not stand up to scrutiny.

This is why, across the world, the gender lobby has tried to work stealthily.

Once Maddow and her MSNBC bosses become aware that there is a growing GC movement (not just conservatives, but also Lefty feminists and every sane American) they will attempt to push back, and inadvertently expose the absurdities of gender ideology by bringing it into the light.

Once gender ideology is in the spotlight, we can publicly dissect it, and then most people will turn against it. Let's hope that it's before the Democrats can do more damage.

So yes, I think we should all be writing to the media and to politicians as much as we can, so that we can get the gender issue into the public square and people have the opportunity to learn and then protest.

BTW: I don't watch US cable "news" because of the reasons you stated.

[–]our_team_is_winning 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I would like Rachel Maddow to invite some posters from "actual lesbians" on her show -- you know, the men who want to tell women what a "real" lesbian is. I'd like her to have an unscripted talk with a group of them. Get some burly hulking balding male to look right at her and say "well you know that I'm a lesbian woman the same as you, right?" and go for a closeup of her face.

If that didn't peak her and her audience, nothing would.

[–]BEB[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

She's not going to do it because she's a corporate puppet, playing her role in the puppet show that is the US media as a "Progressive" to Fox's role as "Conservative."

She only cares for herself, for her ability to be a loudmouth and get paid for it, and for the worship she gets from her fans.

[–]slushpilot 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I think I have the same sense as you. It will take someone who is a woman on that side of the political spectrum—almost a hardliner—who is willing to finally say OK, cut the bullshit, we need to talk. I can't think of anyone better than Maddow.

I just can't see a response from her happening, but maybe if enough people bring it up then it can't be ignored.

[–]BEB[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I just want Maddow to discuss it on air, because her corporate overlords will make sure she takes the gender lobby's side.

Then a huge junk of the "Progressive" MSNBC audience will see what kind of hoops Maddow has to jump through to justify TiMs in women's sports, which I think will be the crack to allow a broader discussion of what gender ideology is doing to women/gay/parent rights,women's sports, children, science denial and the truth.

[–]PassionateIntensity 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I predict she doesn't have the balls to be honest, but I would love to be proved wrong.

[–]GDC 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why would we expect a tim to speak up for women's rights? Not in a million years....

[–]censorshipment 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun -  (2 children)

Why not Ellen DeGeneres? Wasn't she an ass to that big linebacker beauty guru? She may as well join the club.

[–]BEB[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I've actually met her too. In my opinion, she's a narcissistic user, so I think that whatever her actual thoughts are on the matter, there's no way she's going to risk her livelihood to speak out.

[–]GDC 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ellen was okay with hillary telling her that she can't marry her partner. Every media host is another status Quo's shill.