you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]BiologyIsReal[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yes, despite all their talks about intersectionalism, they are very racist.

[–]VioletRemi 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What I've noticed "intersectional feminism" and "intersectionalism" in gender movement - do not understand what "intersectional" even means.

Intersectional feminism should be like this: There is disabled woman, poor woman and woman of color. They all have problems because they are women. However, each of them have their own additional problem because they are disabled but also woman, they are poor but also woman, they are of color but also woman. They have one main goal which is intersected by different problems, so intersectional feminism should be focusing on doing help to all women and deal with special cases of being treated differently - like it should be checking racism against women, not racism in general, etc.

Intersectional feminism nowadays: "We must solve all problems, racism for men, global warming problems for everyone, prostate cancer for men, and so on, everything!". And none of those issues is intersecting with each other in any way at all. They are all different issues with nothing in common.

So no wonder they are so racist, albeist and so on.