you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]forwardback 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Ffs. If this comment (from a woman-centered website post) isn't a blatant example of what Murphy was talking about in the article linked in this very Saidit post...

Commenter snipped from previous commenter:

Stop blaming your trump supporting friends and radfems on Twitter; women have the right to vote for whomever they please and for whatever single issue they please. For some women, this is a hill to die on.

And proceeds to say this:

And that makes them contemptibly stupid. If someone voted for Trump because they truly thought it would be better for women, they're simply too stupid to be useful and should be kept placid and away from the adults while we're working.

Edit. Tell me how that is in no way a sexist remark!

[–]purrfect 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It is. "Either you vote like I think you should or you're stupid". How is that argument not patronizing or worthy of respect?

I'm not saying I would have voted for Trump, but removing the category of sex, like Biden is planning to do, looks like an insane idea to me. The level of insanity the left likes to apply to Trump. Don't get me wrong, I trust the Rs as far as I can throw them, when it comes to gender ideology. The Left is not the only one pushing gender ideology in Western societies, but since the Left has so happily taken it as a priority, the Right is letting them do the dirty work. We all know Rs are not to be trusted, but they are not the ones planning to do the ultimate harm. D's are not only pro self-ID, but pro prostitution and pro surrogacy. The idea that women fearing Biden is over a single issue and therefore voting Trump is worthy of contempt proves Meghan Murphy exactly right.