you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Catbug 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Giving hormones for precocious puberty is a different kettle of fish imo. It’s not a great treatment, but it’s done with less malicious intentions.

Mastectomies for 13 year old girls is absolute madness though. Straight up mutilating children for an experiment to see if they deal with it as they age.

[–]worried19[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

From the article, it appears she put that 8 year old girl on testosterone, not blockers. Testosterone is not a treatment for precocious puberty.

13 is the youngest I've found for mastectomies. If doctors are doing it any younger, it hasn't been reported on, but it's clear Olson-Kennedy would have zero ethical concerns. She also wants to lower the age for genital surgeries and advocates for reporting parents who refuse to support minors transitioning to the government. She's a very dangerous person with a lot of blood on her hands, in my book.

An endless stream of horrible acts:

https://4thwavenow.com/tag/johanna-olson-kennedy

[–]Catbug 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

What an absolute monster. Precocious puberty sucks and she’s not even treating it just using it as an excuse to experiment on this tiny little girl!?

They’re so boldly proud of using children as experiments

[–]worried19[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

What I want to know is who authorized injecting an 8 year old with testosterone?

This tweet makes it sound like Olson-Kennedy made a unilateral decision to lower the age for cross-sex hormones to 8:

https://twitter.com/4th_wavenow/status/1111981985243766786

Surely a doctor doesn't have unilateral power to put a child of any age on any drug in existence? A doctor can't prescribe Viagra to an 8 year old, right? Did someone approve Olson-Kennedy to do this, and if so, what organization gave that approval?

[–]Catbug 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

That’s a really good point. There’s gotta be some board of people deciding that this is acceptable. Are ethics committees really this far gone or are they somehow not involved in this? Who’s approving her “treatments” and facilitating the surgery?

It’s scary how many people are involved in just one kid being subjected to this, and there’s hundreds of kids it’s happening to.

[–]worried19[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Would the Freedom of Information Act help with this? Maybe someone could request the info and see what it reveals.

Maybe some brave journalist out there. The BBC is taking a hard look at Tavistock. I wonder if American journalists will follow suit.

[–]Catbug 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

God I hope someone does manage to expose the dodgy stuff going on.