you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Immortallogic 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

I saw this somewhere as well, it's quite interesting tbh. Damaging as fuck, but interesting. Thanks for the resources, I'll def check them out and earn the parents of young kids that I know.

I also saw this image where in schools they're showing kids the different sexualities or whatever with lgbt nice and bright and rainbow colored, trans with the pink, blue and white and NB with some other bright colors. And for the normal heterosexual it's just grey and white. So of course the kids want to be associating with the bright and colorful ones. It's so fucked.

[–]BEB 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Joe Biden's foundation has partnered with an organization called Gender Spectrum that goes into US schools with the kind of bullshit you're talking about, trying to convince very young kids that sex is a spectrum and that they might be transgender or whatever - as usual gender ideology logic falls apart on even the briefest inspection.

Last year, Gender Spectrum boasted on Twitter about targeting Hispanic children. I'm guessing knowing full well that a significant portion of these kids' parents would not speak English well if at all, or would be non-native English speakers. SHAMELESS.

[–]Immortallogic 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Fuck this is all terrifying. There is little middle ground left in politics -_- time to go full force green party lol, but who knows their stance in this gender shit

[–]BEB 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

The Green Party somewhere in Europe, or it could have been the UK, decided to change the word for "women" to "non-men" so the Green Party (while I am very much an environmentalist) is not an option for me.

[–]Immortallogic 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You're serious? Jesus Christ. Who comes up with this shit?? And who endorses it thinking it's ok?

Looks like we got to start our own political party... CSP - the "Common Sense Party"

[–]BEB 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Totally serious. It was some European or UK Green Party and they changed the definition of "woman" to "non-man"

IIRC The German Greens were full of TIMs, especially on their "Women's" committees.

[–]Immortallogic 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Damn, Germany of all places too eh. The UK is falling all over themselves trying to accommodate TiMs, from what I've seen/read. I guess all the western lib democracies are breeding grounds for this shit.

The religious countries aren't, but they're against anything related to women's rights or seeing women as anything other than properties or breeders anyway anyway usually...

Not sure about the Nordic countries though, where they fall. If anything, they would be the ones to use some sense.

[–]BEB 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The gender lobby started in earnest at a meeting of human rights activists in Indonesia in 2006. That's where the plans were laid out in what are called the Yogyakarta Principles, which were amended to be the Yogyakarta Principles Plus Ten in 2017.

The Yogyakarta Principles are the gender lobby's road map/ game plan. They sound great on paper, but, in practice, seem to directly conflict with the rights of other groups waves especially WOMEN.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yogyakarta_Principles