you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 65 insightful - 1 fun65 insightful - 0 fun66 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Just do what Meghan Murphy does and ask "what is a woman?" (make sure they don't answer cyclically, i.e. in a way that involves the word "woman") or ask them "what is a transwoman?"

Because she's right, there's no real definition for what it means to be trans and they usually can't describe what a woman is other than "someone who identifies as a woman" which isn't a description at all. It's like saying "an apple is something that seems like an apple".

[–]SpatOuttheKoolaid 46 insightful - 5 fun46 insightful - 4 fun47 insightful - 5 fun -  (4 children)

If "transwomen are women" with no difference whatsoever to biological women, then why does transgenderism even exist? Wouldn't it be redundant?

[–]RestingWitchface 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Funny how we are accused of "erasing trans people's existence" when they are the ones denying the very thing that makes them trans in the first place.

[–]SpatOuttheKoolaid 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They project more than a movie theater

[–][deleted] 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Right, they use circular reasoning without answering the original question.

[–]lyth 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I asked that before and when I do: 1)they simply ignore the question Or 2) they say something like "Being a woman is a complicate thing. It's not something you can define in a few words. It's something complex, just like being a German is a complex thing. When are you German: when you were born in Germany? But what if you have German parents, yet no German citizenship?" to dodge the question