How much do we owe to strangers?

submitted by HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex from self.GCdebatesQT

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Yes because spaces exclusively for females are not public spaces. Yes because the other option is to silently be frightened until an offence is committed against you or in front of you. You are comparing the molestation of a child to a woman politely saying “this is the womens room, sir” and somehow not seeing any flaw with it

[–]GenderbenderShe/her/hers 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

The person who they confronted was a woman though. What if that person was a detransitioning trans man and still has a male sounding voice?

In my state it's illegal to deny "the use of rest rooms, locker rooms, or other facilities consistent with a person's gender identity." When I was in college signs were posted in each bathrooms about the law and anyone who harasses a person in the restroom will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. These signs were posted in vocational school, and are posted in public parks and libraries. Not only do I consider it harassment, the state does too and will prosecute you for this.

https://dhr.ny.gov/genda

If you want a space exclusively for females, you are welcome to create one in your own home.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Your state laws are not universal. Your state is your state. My nation is not yet so foolish. Asking a question is not harassment just because you say so.

So women can stay home if they want sex segregation? That’s your answer? Women can just stay home if they don’t want to risk being harmed. Yet again you are busting out rhetoric that is dangerously close to victim blaming.

Should women also not wear short skirts to avoid sexual assault? Don’t carry a big purse if we don’t want them snatched? Should we stay home all day so nobody breaks our door locks? Should immunocompromised people stay home if they don’t want someone to sneeze directly on them?

Or is there a actually a social norm amongst most of society where people put in place safeguards to ensure maximum safety?

Do you object to guard rails? Signs pointing out hazards? Helmets? Or are you only upset when women have safeguards?

You are literally advocating for the urinary leash intended to keep women out of public life that was addressed by early feminists. And claiming to be feminist whilst doing it. What a nauseating act of mens rights activism.

Interesting how you continue refusing to answer anything that cannot be turned into your usual misogynistic tra drivel. Why do you insist on using the poorest and least convincing methods to try and convince us tra is anything but misogyny? If you’re ao invested in it, it would be more useful to you to actually address points we make instead of responding to everything with a tangent that’s focused on the endless repetition of your feelings, your states pandering laws, and the same five tired old ovarit links.

Shape up gb.

[–]GenderbenderShe/her/hers 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Women can just stay home if they don’t want to risk being harmed.

When you go outside in public, there is a risk of being harmed. This is true for everyone, men, women and enbies.

Yet again you are busting out rhetoric that is dangerously close to victim blaming.

That is not close to victim blaming.

Do you object to guard rails? Signs pointing out hazards? Helmets? Or are you only upset when women have safeguards?

I don't object to safeguards as long as they are applied to adults EQUALLY. Imagine if only women were told to wear helmets when riding a bike but not men. I would object to that. If a sign claimed something is hazardous to people of a certain race, I would object to that.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Gb this is the stupidest thing I’ve read in weeks.

By this logic prostate prostate or cervix exams are bad because they are not for both sexes. We shouldn’t be extra vigilant for sickle cell anemia in people with African heritage despite the higher likelihood of having it..

Get a clue omg.

You don’t answer questions, you don’t make arguments that amount to anything more than saying “no they don’t!” When told a group does something (even with proof of it) or you glom on just to try and make people use the pronouns you think are right.

Is it deliberate or are you genuinely incapable of engaging beyond a surface level toddler-like repetition of “nope! No it’s not! I don’t like it! No!”

[–]GenderbenderShe/her/hers 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

By this logic prostate prostate or cervix exams are bad because they are not for both sexes. We shouldn’t be extra vigilant for sickle cell anemia in people with African heritage despite the higher likelihood of having it..

These are medical issues, not safety issues.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How about you go back and answer all the questions you ignored now. Or at least explain how you can shamelessly post nothing but foolish non-answers. Why aren’t you embarrassed by it?