Houseplant comments on Both:What's with all the disappearing threads that didn't go as OPs who are QT expected?

This post is locked. You won't be able to comment.

Both:What's with all the disappearing threads that didn't go as OPs who are QT expected?

submitted 2 years ago by MarkTwainiac from self.GCdebatesQT

27 comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 15 insightful - 2 fun15 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 2 fun - 2 years ago (9 children)

Mild criticism of you is a wild giant tantrum? If we’re so sad with our big dumb arguments why not make a decent point that refutes a single one instead of screaming ‘sauce!? Sauce please!?’ When someone says rape hurts a woman?

Why do you need answers and sources so badly for something you think is so stupid?

Why are you still posting here like you want a last word or some zinger if we’re all so dumb and wrong? Surely you’d just wow us with your intellect and then run back to your fellow brainiacs on r/traaaaaaaaans.

Your inability to adapt to a forum outside of Reddit and refusal to read what we say before asking silly questions means we are sad and wrong? 👍🏻 Checks out. We are wrong about sexed segregation and you’ve proven it by ignoring our arguments and calling it a circlejerk. Good one man, sure showed us.

[–][deleted] 2 years ago (8 children)

[deleted]

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 2 fun - 2 years ago* (4 children)

[+][deleted] 2 years ago (3 children)

[deleted]

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago* (0 children)

You can ask for data, but the claims made should require data. A claim like ‘these women who were raped or attacked were harmed’ does not require further proof beyond existence of the case.

A claim like “x number of women will be harmed each day be erasing women’s spaces’ would require further data.

You are allowed to delete your threads? Nobody stopped you. Twain asked if you would please restore them and a two second joke was made about why you deleted them in a similar fashion to about ten other users who have asked poor questions, gotten annoyed by our answers, and deleted their threads as well.

This is not actually preventing you from deleting or making posts.

Please, show me where we call ourselves clever or are making jokes about someone being ran out. I can’t find that post.

If you do intend on posting here it might help for you to make an effort to differentiate us as individuals and not a team you are arguing against. This is the second time you’ve complained to me about what someone else has said to you as though I’m to justify it or am responsible for it. Few people will respond well to being spoken to like they are a member of a hive mind. It comes across as trolling and really disinterested in honest debate.

Do you want to take the high road or not? You start off there and then trip into far snarkier statements than what we’re made about you. The fun vote immediately after complaining about it? Cmon.

[–]MarkTwainiac[S] 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago* (1 child)

P. S. Everyone who is so pleased with themselves for "misgendering" me or "correctly" guessing my sex (MarkTwainiac), Im a trans man. I guess your male/female psychology theories arent so Super Smart after all, huh?

Sheesh. Reading comprehension seems not to be your strong suit. Nor nuance, either. This is the statement I made that you say amounts to "misgendering" you:

Also, your use of the term "circlejerk" will definitely strike others here as indicative of your sex and sensibility.

Anyone who actually reads what I wrote word by word will see that I carefully phrased it so that I did not state what sex I thought you might be. I said that your repeated use of a vulgar term for male group masturbation that historically has been most commonly used by tween and teen boys, and today is a fave of those want to affect a macho edgelord persona online, "will definitely strike others here as indicative of your sex and sensibility." Which it does. But I purposely stopped short of naming which sex. Coz the fact is, some of the most misogynistic people on earth today are female. Some are females who "identify as" the opposite sex or as "non binary," but others are just plain bog standard female people who don't make claims to having any special gender identities. Though many have bought into gender ideology.

Since I'm having to spell everything out, I was also making a joking reference to a famous book by Jane Austen that you might find eye-opening.

I guess your male/female psychology theories arent so Super Smart after all, huh?

Where, pray tell, did I put forward any sweeping "male/female psychology theories"? Even if I had put forward such theories, I don't think they'd be as simplistic as you imagine. I'd never suggest that misogyny, vulgarity, braggadocio and preoccupation with dicks and guys wanking are exclusive to male psychology. Coz lots of females proudly display these traits and tendencies especially today. Some even do so in the misguided belief that it makes them seem like big cocksure men.

[–]BiologyIsReal 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (2 children)

[–][deleted] 2 years ago (1 child)

[deleted]

[–]BiologyIsReal[M] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (0 children)

GCdebatesQT

MODERATORS