What subs never appear in /all? Is there a list somewhere?

submitted by Chipit from self.AskSaidIt

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]bobbobbybob 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (35 children)

not at all. Its sole purpose is to name retards. An important social release valve when dealing with an internet full of idiots.

Its not on the /all sub, and is listed as NSFW, so hardly visible at all. Don't get your panties in a twist.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (34 children)

Site-wide rules still apply to subs that aren't in all, and to all users regardless of where they post.

[–]bobbobbybob 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (33 children)

ah, get a little bit of power, and soon the totalitarianism seeps in.

are you still sore that I took on your skiting about karma and wiped the floor with you in a week? I'm sure that now you've got yourself some authoritay your karma has grown past mine again, since people will turn to you.

oh.

whoops.

give it some time.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (32 children)

wiped the floor

lmao get over yourself. nobody but you (and your now-banned simp) thinks that

[–]bobbobbybob 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (31 children)

funny. When you were the one who initiated the whole thing by going on and on about your karma and how special it made you.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

I made one post and it offended you. One post isn't "going on and on".

[–]bobbobbybob 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (15 children)

a true measure of character is the ability to own your own actions. You singularly fail at that. When you first arrived, you spammed the place with links to your various social media profiles and blog sites. remember? do you then remember attacking me for 'stalking you' because i clicked on one of the links and talked about the content that you had directed us to look at?

You are a pathetic example of the narcissistic self-involvement and dishonesty of trannies.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

a true measure of character is the ability to own your own actions. You singularly fail at that.

I do own my actions, I just don't apologize for offending snowflakes.

links to your various social media profiles and blog sites

I think it was essays, actually. Regardless, that doesn't break the rules. Calling everyone "retards" does.

do you then remember attacking me for 'stalking you'

You literally went through my profile replying to all my old posts. That's stalking.

You are a pathetic example of the narcissistic self-involvement and dishonesty of trannies.

Actually, that describes you. Narcists always project themselves upon others. They also think the world revolves around them, which you do.

[–]bobbobbybob 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (13 children)

oh, classic. the ubermod, threatening to ban me for calling people 'faggots', calls me a snowflake, in a roundabout way.

I think it was essays, actually.

3 social media profiles, at least one blog site. but we'll never know, because I can't find it on your profile anymore. What I wrote wasn't about 'breaking the rules", it was about your subsequent accusations of 'stalking' to people who followed the links you told us to read.

You literally went through my profile replying to all my old posts. That's stalking.

I literally didn't. there you go again with the gaslighting and lies. I responded to your FIRST POST at the time you wrote it and you accused me of stalking you THERE. Again. I've looked, but can't find it anymore. Did you really scrub your history to make your subsequent re-telling of history seem more legitimate? You are a fucking cancer, dude.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

threatening to ban me

It's not a threat, I won't do it. What I have already done is asked magnora to ban you.

for calling people 'faggots', calls me a snowflake

Again, I didn't write the rules.

3 social media profiles

I never posted my profile pages, but I think I posted a few of my Gab posts; I know I posted some YouTube videos, and all of my essays are posted on SaidIt. Whether or not that counts as "social media profiles" is up to you, but regardless, is ain't against the rules.

at least one blog site

What blog site? This is one-hundred percent false — I won't say a lie, because it's possible you mistook another website for a blog site. Regardless, I ain't got no blog.

but we'll never know, because I can't find it on your profile anymore

Yeah, I deleted a lot of posts a while back because I wanted you to shut up and stop going through my profile. That didn't work, but I thought it would.

I literally didn't.

You did, actually.

I responded to your FIRST POST at the time you wrote it and you accused me of stalking you THERE.

Actually, that was long after my first post. Quite suspicious that your response isn't there... even when I'm in admin mode, which lets me see deleted/removed comments...

Did you really scrub your history to make your subsequent re-telling of history seem more legitimate?

No, I literally just wanted you to shut up; I didn't think past that.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

And you know the original argument was because you got offended that I posted a comment twice and began dragging discussion down the Pyramid of Debate by making accusations and calling names.

[–]bobbobbybob 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

are you now acknowledging that you began the whole "i have imaginary internet points and that makes me better" thing? or you going to try and gaslight me and deny it, by behaving like a child and making out that anything that was said beforehand has any bearing on the subject at all.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

I never said "that makes me better". It was just a dumb post about "hey, look, I got useless internet points that literally have no value".

I bet you saw that post and thought it was about you.... lmao, the world doesn't revolve around you. I didn't even think about you until you started freaking out.

[–]bobbobbybob 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

It was just a dumb post about "hey, look, I got useless internet points that literally have no value".

literal gaslighting.

I bet you saw that post and thought it was about you.

That's exactly what you tried to transform the narrative to when i pointed out the meaninglessness of imaginary internet points. If I recall (and will find, if you have not scrubbed your history) your initial presentation was quite opposite

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Nope. That's what it was.