What subs never appear in /all? Is there a list somewhere?

submitted by Chipit from self.AskSaidIt

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]bobbobbybob 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

are you now acknowledging that you began the whole "i have imaginary internet points and that makes me better" thing? or you going to try and gaslight me and deny it, by behaving like a child and making out that anything that was said beforehand has any bearing on the subject at all.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

I never said "that makes me better". It was just a dumb post about "hey, look, I got useless internet points that literally have no value".

I bet you saw that post and thought it was about you.... lmao, the world doesn't revolve around you. I didn't even think about you until you started freaking out.

[–]bobbobbybob 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

It was just a dumb post about "hey, look, I got useless internet points that literally have no value".

literal gaslighting.

I bet you saw that post and thought it was about you.

That's exactly what you tried to transform the narrative to when i pointed out the meaninglessness of imaginary internet points. If I recall (and will find, if you have not scrubbed your history) your initial presentation was quite opposite

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Nope. That's what it was.

[–]bobbobbybob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

prove it. where is the post?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

I deleted it so you'd shut up.

[–]bobbobbybob 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

I deleted it so you'd shut up.

Does that kind of pivot, to make the person you are lying to 'responsible' for whatever dishonesty you are engaged in work very often? I get that it is a direct 'appeal to ego' attack, utilising the target's ego to derail them from their focus, but it is pretty lame and makes you appear weak.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I literally just wanted you to shut up, because you made dozens of comments on my old posts.

[–]bobbobbybob 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

just keep repeating the lie.

You trashed 80% of your content, just to stop me commenting? Utter bullshit and no one in their right mind would believe it. you could just block me.

the only reason you would remove content is because it paints you in a bad light. You've edited your history to create an image that you now use to foundation your 'i'm a admin' power trip.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You trashed 80% of your content, just to stop me commenting?

Yes.

you could just block me.

Doesn't stop you from replying. I also wanted to make sure I could argue against all the lies you and dio (now banned, I think for the same thing as you) kept spreading.