One year later, why is the Nord Stream attack still a mystery?

submitted by Drewski from responsiblestatecraft.org

all 7 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]KleinWolf35 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It is not a mystery. NAFO unleashed bots that caused the CPU on the pipeline to overreact and explode.

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

OP finds it super important that all crimes from this war are fully looked into lol

Lol

[–]P-38lightning 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It's not a mystery. Joe Biden said if Russia invades Ukraine (which he wanted), he would end Nord Stream and he did.

[–]Censorship_Most_Foul 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Right. Also heard underwater divers performed an "exercise" where the charges were planted. Divers were told devices were inert. All "they" had to do was detonate when it was convenient.

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Because IRL isn't a movie. Sometimes when Ukranians carry out a CIA plot, we never find out whodunnit.

If something happens where there are no observers, it's gonna be a mystery unless the perpetrator blabs about it. Duh?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It’s not a mystery.

[–]binaryblob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Either because they do know and they have no incentive for you to know or because they actually don't know.

So, if we try to answer the question why you don't know yet (you are the center of the universe for yourself, right?), then the answer is easy: you are of no interest to them and you don't have your own spy network to know.

Given the fact one of the first things to do when inventing satellite technology is to plaster space with them and satellite technology is quite old, it would make sense that infrastructure of high geopolitical interest are monitored 24/7/365, if only because someone asked the president a few decades ago "Let's say something were to happen to geopolitically important resources, do you want to know what happened to them or do you want to look like a dumb fuck?".

So, what do you think? Do you think they are just a bunch of complete idiots (spending hundreds of billions of dollars on this shit per year) or do you think they just don't tell you unless it is in their best interest?

This is what they want you to know: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/07/us/politics/nord-stream-pipeline-sabotage-ukraine.html. Regardless of who did it, it cost me quite a bit of money and I would really like to get reimbursed for damage someday. I have no doubt that such payments will be made once the war is over. The war can only end in one way, which is with NATO-weapons fully battle tested and then when there is nothing left to learn anymore, somehow some magic cache of weapons will appear and Ukraine will win, at least unless the West really is fucking stupid (at least Europe is, the US with a Democrat as leader doesn't seem to be stupid). As such, from what I hear the plan is to kick out Russia before the next US election. I guess we will see how much control the US has over the war. Some people have claimed the US is prolonging the war to benefit the military industrial complex, which wouldn't be the first time.