use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~9 users here now
Definition of racism
submitted 1 year ago by StalwartJames from imgoat.com
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - 1 year ago (5 children)
No sources, huh?
[–]HurkaDurka 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (4 children)
Too scared to take the bet, huh? That's disappointing. Why don't you admit you were talking out of your ass and that you know races exist.
[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - 1 year ago (3 children)
Let's not change the subject. You're the one who is scared to back up the assertion, that is supposedly obvious.
You made the claim. Back it up.
I know you won't, because your scared. The fact is, beyond hollow cosmetic differences; you are fucked.
I'm going to take you to the cleaners.
I'm loving it. ;-)
[–]HurkaDurka 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (2 children)
I already did back it up. You just didn't want to accept my answer. You can literally see the differences in races. Proving that differences exist. That doesn't take a source. I could send you a picture of two races to prove that, but I don't need to. You already know you are wrong. You're embarrassed but afraid to quit. Tell you what. I'll drop the bet, and instead, if I provide sources that races exist, you have to delete this account and start a new one. Deal? I'm not submitting to you without some kind of gain for me.
And guess what, hollow cosmetic differences ARE STILL FUCKING DIFFERENCES. You just admitted you were wrong, and are still trying to argue. I'm embarrassed for you at this point. Will you take the deal though?
[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (1 child)
You're ramblings is not evidence. "Everybody knows" doesn't cut it.
You need sources. I suggests adding eugenics to your search. That's were you may find some Pseudoscience.
[–]HurkaDurka 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (0 children)
You're such a coward you won't even agree to a bet or to ending your account. I give in though since you are genuinely pathetic enough to believe you are right:
https://www.health.harvard.edu/heart-health/race-and-ethnicity-clues-to-your-heart-disease-risk (gasp, they acknowledge both nature AND nurture, like I originally did)
I could go on indefinitely, but something tells me you won't absorb any of this anyway. I couldn't give a fuck about eugenics faggots trying rank the races. They're about as dumb as people that deny that races even exist. Except you already admitted that races have different physical (you said cosmetic, which is still a physical trait, and those traits have numerous impacts on health) traits, so you already conceded the argument and agreed with my original point. That there are natural differences amongst races.