How to say the trial was a political hit without saying it was a political hit

submitted by passionflounderPaper tiger from twitter.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

You're claiming to believe there was a lie, which is contrary to the evidence I saw LOL

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

So for instance, you think his New York apartment actually was three times the size for the banks than it was for the tax department?

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I actually don't think about it at all, thanks for asking

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

So you "saw" the evidence and you thought that evidence was contrary to the fact that it was a lie ... Without thinking about it at all?

Difficult to believe. But you be you.

Those of us that thought about it found the evidence to show there was fraud. As did the court.

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sure, partisan hacks are gonna hack