How to save the earth according to flat earther and people that believe in the physics of fast and the furious

submitted by Tom_BombadilBombadildo from 9gag.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Tom_BombadilBombadildo[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Meaning think physics is a religious belief?

Again proving my point.

Clearly, you can't distinguish the difference.

You made my point for me.

Of course. Soon at more are available.

We've found some common ground.

You and I are both happy, for you to take more vaccines.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Clearly, you can't distinguish the difference.

Between physics and a religion?

You're the one banging on about "religion of scientism" as if science is a religion.

And you're unable to understand the greenhouse effect.

[–]Tom_BombadilBombadildo[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

And you're unable to understand the greenhouse effect.

Lol. The scientism guy thinks absorbtion/emission bands can create the greenhouse effect.

Everyone who believes this greenhouse nonsense is clueless. Literally.

They're just repeating someone else's note cards. You are too.

You saved an argument that you believe was conclusive, which shows your weakness.

People who actually understand the mechanisms of interaction will see through your nonsense. My argument is based in physical reality, and not a greenhouse note card narrative.

Bill Gates should hurry up with another batch of injections for you, and your scientism cult.

Live by the scientism, and die by the scientism.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Lol. The scientism guy thinks absorbtion/emission bands can create the greenhouse effect.

Yes that's what the greenhouse effect is.

A gas that absorbs more energy from the earth's emissions than the sun's is a greenhouse gas.

My argument is based in physical reality, and not a greenhouse note card narrative.

Which is that absorption can't happen because ... absorption bands are "narrow".

There's detailed numerical methods for transmission of emr through the earth's atmosphere.

Here's one you could play with to improve your intuition about the effect of atmospheric CO2:http://modtran.spectral.com/modtran_home

[–]Tom_BombadilBombadildo[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Yes that's what the greenhouse effect is.

A gas that absorbs more energy from the earth's emissions than the sun's is a greenhouse gas.

You are a clueless retard.

A greenhouse is an enclosed environment, with windows that allow visible light with higher energy to pass through and warm the interior.

The windows are transparent to visible light, but opaque to infrared light. So when the sun goes down, the infrared light is retained within the self-contained greenhouse environment.

Greenhouses don't function properly at night if doors or window are open. They are necessarily enclosed.

Significant cloud cover is similar to the greenhouse effect, because infrared light from the surface is reflected over a large area, which returns the heat to the surface.
Similar to the infrared emission of light from the windows/walls of a greenhouse. Same physical principle.

Gaseous CO2 can never reproduce this effect. It emits what it absorbs, same as everything else that absorbs light energy, and emits it. When the sun sets, the energy dissipates and everything on the surface cools; including the air in every emission band.
The radiated heat is lost to space. Period.

Concrete heats up in the day, and cools at night.
Water heats up in the day, and cools at night.

[FILL IN THE BLANK] heats up in the day, and cools at night.

UNLESS IT'S IN A GREENHOUSE, OR UNDER HEAVY CLOUD COVER AT NIGHT. To address your lame cloud cooling argument.

It's warmer at night, under cloud cover.

It's cold AF at night in the desert, because there are no clouds.
No clouds in a desert in the day, so it gets hot, and the same heat is lost at night. A much higher temp range of max/min in the desert.

Why aren't the global warming goons talking about cloud cover???

You're trying to but a bullshit spin on this fact, because you are clueless.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

You are a clueless retard.

You seem upset. That can happen when you know that you're wrong. It's called cognitive dissonance.

A greenhouse doesn't work using the greenhouse effect. It works by stopping heat loss by convection, which is why they work best with the door shut. Glass isn't opaque to infra-red.

The net effect of clouds is to cool the earth by 18 Watts per square meter, if globally averaged: https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/wcc.694

Gaseous CO2 can never reproduce this effect. It emits what it absorbs, same as everything else that absorbs light energy, and emits it.

This is wrong too. A molecule of CO2 that absorbs a photon will interact with several other molecules before emitting a photon again. Any of these interactions may convert the energy to heat, in which case a photon is never emitted: https://scied.ucar.edu/learning-zone/how-climate-works/carbon-dioxide-absorbs-and-re-emits-infrared-radiation

It's warmer at night, under cloud cover

Yes. At night, clouds warm. But their net effect is coming.

Why aren't the global warming goons talking about cloud cover???

Because clouds aren't causing the increased warming. There were clouds already before the rapid warning since the middle of last century.

[–]Tom_BombadilBombadildo[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You are a clueless retard.

You seem upset. That can happen when you know that you're wrong. It's called cognitive dissonance.

Not this time. You've been checkmated.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I've corrected some of your misunderstandings in my post above.

Glass is transparent to infra red.

The total average effect of clouds is cooling.

CO2 in the atmosphere will not necessarily emit what it absorbs.

But why do you think clouds are important to global warming? You realize that there were clouds already before the industrial revolution, right?

[–]Tom_BombadilBombadildo[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sure. The global warming hoax has researchers nitpicking about "near infrared" [almost visible red light] and other trivial nonsense, just like the CO2 warming hoax.

You can also find plenty of "convincing" "scientific" articles claiming COVID vaccines are safe and effective. All cause mortality has skyrocketed since 2021 and continues in 2023 without a "pandemic".

The facts I outlined are overwhelmingly on my side, and I don't care to debate foolish fanatics.

Hopefully, you and the global warming idiots get plenty of those vaccines, and solve the modern idiocy emergency.

Almost everyone who took the jabs regrets it.

The same scumbags behind that, are behind the global warming hoax. They funded the fake science.

But people are waking up. The truth always comes out in the end.

Many jabbed people won't make it that far, and they have people like you to thank for an early demise.