Remember when the media got caught using video game footage when reporting on the war in Ukraine? What are the odds that Israel would do the same thing?

submitted by Oyveygoyim from imgbly.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Site_rly_sux 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

"the media" lol

Number one and three are twitter randoms.

YOU are literally spreading fakes.

Number two images are actually taken directly from the @israeliPM account. So it's actually the office of the prime minister who published those photographs.

And they're absolutely real. "AI detection" software is not real. You're the idiot if you believe software exists to "detect" AI.

So what's even the theory? Hamas killed 1500, they moved from house to house killing, they ripped unborn out of stomachs, they threw grenades in bomb shelters, they decapitated people ON CAMERA including the Philippinan dude.....but you want to insist they didn't burn a baby? Again you're a fucking idiot.

What's the purpose of your post

The purpose of your post is to distract from the massive hamas lie about 500 dead at a hospital. The massive hamas lie which has spread around the world because of careless idiots LIKE YOU

YOU are literally spreading fakes

[–]TheMaharishi 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Of fucking course you can detect AI generation. If a human eye can see it. It's no mystery an app can see it. A personal friend of mine used to, maybe still does haven't heard from in years, work on visual fault detection.

Don't confuse confident lies with knowledge people. The guy with the loudest voice is very rarely the most informed voice.

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Of fucking course you can detect AI generation

Not with infallible precision and recall.

very rarely the most informed voice.

Here are the steps I took to gather evidence when forming my opinion.

According to the community notes, the AI detection used was AIornot. So, I went to their website and checked out how they describe their methodology (they don't).

Then I clicked the links here

https://www.aiornot.com/press

I found two general patterns.

Pattern one:

Reviewers uploads AI images and in 100% of cases gets an "this was made by AI response". (Indicating false positive bias).

Pattern two:

Reviewers upload a mix of human and AI images and get a cacophony of incorrect responses from the software. For example this reviewer.

https://petapixel.com/2023/06/16/ai-or-not-is-a-free-web-app-that-claims-to-detect-ai-generated-photos/

Who concluded

this platform has a ways to go yet.

So when you wrote

Don't confuse confident lies with knowledge people

Really you were referring to yourself, OP, and the dipshit community note taker.