you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]TheMaharishi 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Of fucking course you can detect AI generation. If a human eye can see it. It's no mystery an app can see it. A personal friend of mine used to, maybe still does haven't heard from in years, work on visual fault detection.

Don't confuse confident lies with knowledge people. The guy with the loudest voice is very rarely the most informed voice.

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Of fucking course you can detect AI generation

Not with infallible precision and recall.

very rarely the most informed voice.

Here are the steps I took to gather evidence when forming my opinion.

According to the community notes, the AI detection used was AIornot. So, I went to their website and checked out how they describe their methodology (they don't).

Then I clicked the links here

https://www.aiornot.com/press

I found two general patterns.

Pattern one:

Reviewers uploads AI images and in 100% of cases gets an "this was made by AI response". (Indicating false positive bias).

Pattern two:

Reviewers upload a mix of human and AI images and get a cacophony of incorrect responses from the software. For example this reviewer.

https://petapixel.com/2023/06/16/ai-or-not-is-a-free-web-app-that-claims-to-detect-ai-generated-photos/

Who concluded

this platform has a ways to go yet.

So when you wrote

Don't confuse confident lies with knowledge people

Really you were referring to yourself, OP, and the dipshit community note taker.