Feminazi platform "Ovarit" ran out of ideas so they problematized the most pettiest thing ever

submitted by bucetao6969 from ovarit.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ageingrockstar 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

I know you from s/wayofthebern. Very disappointing to see you repeatedly calling someone a troll here who's making a vastly better contribution to the conversation / argument than you are.

[–]bucetao6969[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Crazy.

Apparently me being from /s/wayofthebern gives me some sort of status.

It's also funny I don't even consider myself a member of that community, as per my flair there.

It's very annoying you wouldn't at least consider why I'm calling him a troll in the first place. Maybe you should have argued why he's not a troll instead of wanting me to take your comment at face value.

I don't see how his obvious disruption is anything but a contribution. He's like a sophisticated Edward. Even the other commenters are calling him out on his bullshit. Not to mention his account was created during the time the big attacks began.

[–]ageingrockstar 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Apparently me being from /s/wayofthebern gives me some sort of status

No, I'm just saying that's where I know you from (and where I think I've given you some upvotes).

It's very annoying you wouldn't at least consider why I'm calling him a troll in the first place

Because you have trouble with / animosity towards women? That's my guess. But I don't know, because you didn't develop any argument. While they did. Your whole argument was in your submission title and you didn't take it anywhere from there. Oh, and btw, a submission title that opened with what could easily be labeled a trollish word.

There's no disruption coming from u/Hematomato in this thread. They put a considered opinion up against your declarative submission title. And you quite clearly couldn't handle it, and so retreated, puerilely, into name-calling.

[–]bucetao6969[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Because you have trouble with / animosity towards women? That's my guess. But I don't know, because you didn't develop any argument.

Who doesn't? But I didn't argue against women here, I was arguing against feminist/ovarit.

And you feel for the classic feminism trap of confusing feminists with real women.

While they did. Your whole argument was in your submission title and you didn't take it anywhere from there

Because I wasn't arguing. Like you fail to realize, the guy there isn't arguing he's disrupting the conversation. You still yet to prove to me he isn't actually a troll. Just from reading his history you can see he's a troll.

Oh, and btw, a submission title that opened with what could easily be labeled a trollish word.

Nobody called that out, except the troll here. Why didn't you then? Instead of using it as an argument here?

There's no disruption coming from u/Hematomato in this thread

There is, a user even called him out on it. Why didn't you check his history like you mentioned? Why are you dragging this discussion when you failed to do the simple instruction I mentioned?

They put a considered opinion up against your declarative submission title. And you quite clearly couldn't handle it, and so retreated, puerilely, into name-calling.

I didn't name call, because I called him a troll based on his past behaviour. This is not the first time I deal with this user.

[–]Hematomato 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Because I wasn't arguing. Like you fail to realize, the guy there isn't arguing he's disrupting the conversation. You still yet to prove to me he isn't actually a troll. Just from reading his history you can see he's a troll.

I suspect your definition of "disrupting the conversation" is "saying something I disagree with" or even "not getting on the bandwagon with me."

[–]bucetao6969[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

No. I argue with people that disagree with me all the time. You just want to piss people off with your retarded rethorics.

[–]Hematomato 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Well, you don't argue with me. You just call me a name. The most uncreative, vaguest name you can think of, apparently.

[–]bucetao6969[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

There you go again disrupting, saying something I didn't do.

[–]Hematomato 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Calling me a "troll" is most certainly something you did do. It's a vague word - it's an uncreative word - it's a useless word - and it's a word you've used repetitively.