use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~2 users here now
If science has not become a cult why do people get triggered if you don't believe the standard model?
submitted 10 months ago by [deleted] from self.whatever
view the rest of the comments →
[–]William_World 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 10 months ago (8 children)
I can't believe scientists made up something called the uncertainty Principle after they couldn't figure out to justify that it is impossible to figure it out. No, get back to the drawing board.
[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 10 months ago (7 children)
I can't believe scientists made up something called the uncertainty Principle after they couldn't figure out to justify that it is impossible to figure it out.
Oh, you can't believe it? Okay, obviously everyone else is wrong then, and you must be correct.
[–]William_World 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 10 months ago (6 children)
get back to the drawing board and figure it out
[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 10 months ago (5 children)
They have figured it out. At a deep, fundamental level, nature operates according to the rules of quantum mechanics.
[–]William_World 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 10 months ago (4 children)
no quantum mechanics just means we can't figure it out so we never have to. really it's just too hard but they should admit that.
[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 10 months ago (3 children)
It really doesn't.
[–]William_World 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 10 months ago (2 children)
explain in detail
[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 10 months ago (1 child)
Explain in detail 120 years of evidence for quantum mechanics? If I write five hundred thousand words on the history and development of quantum mechanics, will you read them all or stop after the first sentence?
We would probably start with wave interference and the photoelectric effect:
From there go on to the ultraviolet collapse of the atom in classical mechanics and emission/absorption spectra:
That's just the beginning. But the bottom line is that at the scale of atoms, matter behaves as waves, not point-like particles or tiny solid spheres. Mapping those wave functions which spread out to infinity under quantum mechanics to the localised values that we measure occurs probabilistically:
I'm not saying that with quantum mechanics we have reached the end of science and the Ultimate Truth Of The Universe. We still don't know how to reconcile quantum mechanics with gravity and general relativity. It is always possible that the future will bring in a paradigm shift that will change our understanding of wave interference etc.
Nor am I quite ruling out some sort of hidden variable theory that would eliminate the need for wave functions to be interpreted as "probability waves". But such hidden variables would have to violate relativity.
[–]William_World 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 10 months ago (0 children)
back to the drawing board, figure it out
view the rest of the comments →
[–]William_World 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (8 children)
[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (7 children)
[–]William_World 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (6 children)
[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (5 children)
[–]William_World 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (4 children)
[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (3 children)
[–]William_World 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]William_World 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)