you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]hfxB0oyA 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

I've found that Business Insider is not a reliable source upon which to base my opinions.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Then I suggest you look up the other 20+ links at the footer of this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gays_Against_Groomers

Of course a lot of it is obviously biased extreme leftie shit, but there's enough decently reputable sources in there that I'm confident in saying that I'm not going to associate with that nazi/MAGA group. The only thing I hate more than woke SJWs screeching about censorship and defending trancels are the MAGA crowd who think Trump is the Best American Evar.

[–]hfxB0oyA 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Wikipedia isn't the best source either when trying to find any facts about anything political these days, IMHO. Looking in the "talk" part of the page, there's a lot of back and forth about labeling it a "far-right" org. 'Conservative' might be a better label, though I'd say it was small-c, not big-C conservative. I'm saying this as a left leaning Canadian.

Anyhow, we're here to discuss and debate, and I appreciate your perspective.

Also, and it belabours the original point to say, but you obviously don't have to endorse Gays Against Groomers to walk away from Pride. These sorts of things really only gain momentum when ordinary people, not special interest groups or clubs, decide they've had enough.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No, wikipedia is biased as fuck, that's why you should check the links at the end which lead to various sources, both good and bad.

And on that note, I definitely do not support pride as it is today in any shape way or form. They've become the very thing they said they were fighting.