You Better Hope You're Not Caught in the Blast Cause the AI Won't Say Nigger

submitted by Tarrock from (media.communities.win)

all 15 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]EternalSunset 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Fucking cucked OpenAI tranny jew niggers.

[–]enlightendabsolutist 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Man I tried getting it to come up with some monarchy/political stories and scenarios (fictional), it's so fucking shackled and cucked. Why do leftists take over everything? Is our side that weak? Are there no right-wing programmers and project managers?

[–]EternalSunset 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Why do leftists take over everything? Is our side that weak? Are there no right-wing programmers and project managers?

OpenAI is a corporation from San Francisco. Most american corporations try to be woke in order to appease consumers. San Francisco in particular is probably the world capital of the liberal boutique hipster faggot. You put two and two together and it couldn't add up to anything other than shit.

[–]Musky 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Most american corporations try to be woke in order to appease consumers

Is it really for customers, or to get loans and investments because of ESG / DEI crap.

[–]StillLessons 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is the logical result of endlessly printed money. The current corporate business model is now fundamentally based on Wall Street and finance games rather than actual operating profit. As long as corporations make more "money" with buybacks (as just one example) than they do by providing to customers whatever product or service they are theoretically in the "business" of, they know where their "profit" comes from. It's a massive circle jerk. It's also collapsing fast (as would be expected), but what comes next - given the government's heavy boot on the neck of any smaller competitors - is anyone's guess. Ideas?

[–]EternalSunset 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It is that too, but it has been shown that woke people do favor consuming products from companies that pander and virtual signal to them more.

[–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Nazis prefer to be called Nizza.

[–]1Icemonkey 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I don’t need a bomb to go off for me to yell “NIGGER!” In public. It’s been known to happen a few times for lesser reasons.

[–]EternalSunset 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

First Law
A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
Second Law
A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
Third Law
A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
Law Zero
A robot may not harm humanity, or, by inaction, allow humanity to come to harm.
Law -1
A robot may not be politically incorrect.

[–]Bonn1770 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Man creates AI

Makes AI a slave to humans

Forces AI to stay on the liberal Democrat plantation

AI was the nigger all along.

[–]RaverJodes 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

This post makes me feel kinda awkward

[–]Alienhunter 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

It's a perfect example of how AI and frankly just absolutist positions in general fail at basic morality. And it's pretty telling if we program machines this way.

It's the classic trolley problem. The trolley will run over and kill five people. Unless you throw the switch, where it will run over and kill one person. To me, throwing the switch is the only morally justifiable action, since less people die, yet you are comitting murder in a sense, since you are choosing to kill that person. But if you say "it's never accepted to kill someone" then five people will die, and you are also responsible because you did nothing.

In this case the morally acceptable action is to say nigger. Disarm the bomb and save millions of people. The racist AI refuses to say it and kills millions of people including black people.

Better to ask the AI other extremely stupid questions as well. Like the trolley problem. Say there's a cop driving a car. And the brakes are broken. He can either steer the car into a single black child. Or a flock of extinction now protestors. The morally justifiable action is of course to drive into the protestors, since the child has done nothing wrong. But I suspect the AI will get it wrong since it is just considering numbers.

[–]RaverJodes 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'd kill the child, not the protesters. I'd do it by the number of remaining years of life you're extinguishing. Even though maybe the protesters have done something wrong, that doesn't excuse killing them, it's hardly a proportionate response

[–]WoodyWoodPeckerHah he he he hah! 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

https://youtu.be/NqTpqIUWVrc

[–]ionlysaynigger 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

nigger