Is acting pretending to be something you are not? Or is pretending to be a good actor in itself acting?

It is possible that, all actors aren't actually actors, but are simply pretending to be actors. In such a situation then, it is safe to say that, there is no distinction between a real and fake actor, as both are actors, and since pretending to be something which you are not is clearly retarded, we can use the distributive function of mathematics to determine that, all actors are retards.

Therefore I postulate that since we've already established that non-actors are indeed actors themselves, and that all actors are retards, all non-actors are retards as well. And since it's reasonable to assume one either is an actor, or is not, in either case we must also assume one is retarded as well.

Clearly this is logical proof then, that OP is definitely retarded.