use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~0 users here now
Fact checkers
submitted 2 years ago by aaarrgh from media.gab.com
view the rest of the comments →
[–]jet199Instigatrix 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun - 2 years ago (3 children)
Hermaphrodites don't exist in humans.
Intersex people are all either male or female.
Hermaphrodites have full sets of both genitals, that doesn't happen in humans.
[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 2 years ago (2 children)
As of 2010, there have been at least 11 reported cases of fertility in true hermaphrodite humans in the scientific literature,[4] with one case of a person with XY-predominant (96%) mosaic giving birth.[18] However, there have been no documented cases of individuals being fertile as males.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/True_hermaphroditism
https://www.britannica.com/science/hermaphroditism
I'll clarify that, though I used a term (hermaphrodite) that was acceptable a while ago, today I should actually refer to hermaphroditism and intersex people, rather than actual human hermaphrodites. Still, the latter has existed, and is not a myth:
True hermaphroditism occurs when an ovary and a testis or a gonad with mixed histologic features (ovotestis) is present.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/true-hermaphroditism
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3418019/
Sex is just as complicated as humans are. What seems a rather straightforward concept—with an unequivocal answer to the proverbial delivery room question, “Is it a boy or a girl?”—is in reality full of nuances and complexities, just like any human trait. From a biological standpoint, the appearance of the external genitalia is only one parameter among many, including chromosomal constitution, the sequence of sex-determining genes, gonadal structure, the profile of gonadal hormones, and the internal reproductive structures.
https://www.nature.com/articles/gim200711
[–]Kuasocto 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 2 years ago (1 child)
This last quote is really misleading as it doesn't mention that in over 98% of cases everything is simple and straightforward. There's less than 2% of people where you'd genuinely have to double check and think a little, but again, that's a tiny fraction of the population, and still, lots of those people ARE men or women, just a bit atypical.
[–]wristaction 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun - 2 years ago (0 children)
First socks says "and why should anyone take you seriously?" as if he sits on a throne of stacks of social credit.
But then you explain that babies born with DSDs are infertile and he comes back with "NO THERE ARE ELEVEN".
view the rest of the comments →
[–]jet199Instigatrix 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun - (3 children)
[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (2 children)
[–]Kuasocto 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (1 child)
[–]wristaction 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun - (0 children)