You make it clear that you think the Holy Bible is corrupt and so what hope do you have?

Don't take my word for it. That would be foolish and easy way to be deceived. See for yourself the differences between the newer Byzantine text forms and older Alexandrian and Western ones and how they were altered by the copyists. And that's not even getting into the many, many edits made before publication of many of the books, especially Paul's letters. And this is just in the New Testament; think of how many more must be in the Old, with how much more time they've had to change it. Speaking of the Old Testament, you can also check out the Dead Sea Scrolls, the Samaritan version, the Masoretic version, the Septuagint, the Vulgate, and the Peshitta and see many different versions and alterations; and that's only the very recent ones. If you've ever been perplexed about all the contradictions, this is why. And it is also a mistake that the word of Paul, Peter, James, John, Jude, David, Solomon, Ezra, or anyone else is absolute truth in the first place, because they are mere men. Paul told the Galatians that even if he himself started teaching a different gospel that they were to stop listening to him. And he told the Corinthians that he wanted their faith to be in God's power, and not in the wisdom of people. Now there is wisdom to be found in the Bible, but since with the exception of the prophets and words of Jesus it is written by people, how can it be anything but the wisdom of people? Who says it can't contain errors or even misunderstandings? Rome? Why should I listen to the Council of Rome, which took place 300 years later and was led by corrupt clergy and at that point even infiltrated by the Roman government? And when there is a contradiction, and we are bound by the letter, which are we to follow? Do we just pick which one we like better? Or listen to what the televangelist says based on what he likes better? Again, we are to follow the spirit and not be bound by the letter which was in the first place decided by people. There is no record of God or Jesus ever giving a list of supposed holy books. It was assembled by humans, and the proof is right in front of you.

Moses gave 10 commandments to Israel. Do you suppose Moses thought of the commandments himself? He received them from God on the mountain top.

The Old Testament is very corrupt especially in this section, but I do think it's likely that this event happened. In any case, wherever or whoever they came from, they are good, because they uphold Jesus's commandment and are supported by him. But we follow them because of Jesus's commandment, not by their own letter. As for most of the other laws, they are either forgeries or Israelite and Judahite legal laws and cultural codes that somehow made their way into the book. Now God never changes, so how could he turn around in the New Testament and suddenly decide all the evil and pointless laws don't apply anymore, and are in fact against his will? I think it's more likely that he didn't actually sanction them in the first place, which would also explain why the Old Testament figures always seem to break them or not even know of them. And indeed that's exactly what he seems to be complaining about in Jeremiah.

Likewise, the angels do the will of God.

Not fallen angels aka demons or archons, who rule the matrix.

Romans 7:12 Wherefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good.

I did not deny that, but read the rest of it, because he also agrees with me, that we are to follow the spirit and not the letter, and that through the law comes only sin.

If a man, an adult, chooses to be circumcised to fulfill the Jewish law, thinking he will be justified by that, then he is rejecting Christ's sacrifice. Such a man thinks he can justify himself and believes he has no need of Jesus. We that are Christ's are justified by faith, not by works of the flesh, like cutting the foreskin. If a man repents, he will be justified by faith in Jesus, who kept the law perfectly and was sacrificed for us.

Jesus kept the actual law perfectly, which is written on the heart, and in fact requires going against the written law on many points, as Jesus also did. James tried to rewrite the Sermon on the Mount as upholding the law, but it's still a clear rebuke of it, and it is called the work of scribes and Pharisees, just like in Jeremiah. And the fact that even the Judaizing Ebionites didn't accept it is very telling.

Why would God bless a corrupt and wicked generation?

I never made that claim, but if he did it would be because he is merciful, as he has also blessed us despite our failings.

What good is having the Bible if you look for faults in it?

Does a lie nullify the truth? No, but the truth exposes and nullifies the lie. Most of what was written by authentic disciples is in good standing, although even it can contain misunderstandings and even human moral failings. But the main problem is later alterations by scribes who have an earthly agenda. 1 Timothy is a perfect example of this, as it seems to be largely a reaction to Paul's views on celibacy and egalitarianism and food sacrificed to idols expressed 1 Corinthians and Galatians. He also appears to have edited those letters to soften Paul's arguments and bring them more in line with his own views. Notice how confusing 1 Corinthians 7 is, but it makes sense when you skip verses 2-5 and 9. That was the author of 1 Timothy who doesn't like Paul's view that not marrying is better; he wants everyone to marry, pop out babies, follow cultural norms, and always unquestioningly obey authority. So he invented the idea of "the gift of celibacy", which apparently no one has. And boom, Paul's entire discourse is now nothing more than a theoretical situation which can't possibly happen. To this day the human agenda hijacks Christianity and condemns those who don't marry and pop out babies using this excuse. They might as well condemn Jesus for not being married either!

That is like the scribes Jeremiah spoke of who kept the law in vain.

He does not say that they "kept the law in vain," but that they wrote false works and called them the law of God. They commited forgery against him. These laws contained many horrific commandments, such as burning people alive; and all of them are in our copies of the laws of Moses, so it cannot be claimed that this was a different one or merely commentaries on it.

They had the word of life in their possession, but rejected it. Is this you?

No, which is why I won't trade it for theirs.

Nevertheless I am glad that you do not listen to me or take my word for it. I encourage you to keep an open mind and discover the truth for yourself. I'm only telling you what I know, to help you.