you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]jet199Instigatrix 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (4 children)

Not the great take she thinks it is.

https://imgur.com/a/gksGDrl

[–]dingoatemytaco 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Yes - and I think this form of name-calling can be used equally by anti-vaxxers against others, as well as by those who believe in facts, science &c against anti-vaxxers. It's one group referring to another group as lacking an appropriate grasp of reality.

[–]monkeymagic 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

so you’re suggesting that anyone that knows, for a fact that pfizer is a muderous company that is well known and documented for making extremely harmful products lacks some sort of grasp on “reality”?

this reality must be highly fucking subjective.

[–]dingoatemytaco 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

No - that's not the suggestion.

One who grossly oversimplifies international virology research and testing on billions of people to the notion of 'but pfizer makes a profit!' has lost touch with reality, and one reason for this is the spread of lies via social media, churches &c in a manner that builds mass consent to those lies - something one can call Mass Formation Psychosis. But before anyone else can make that term popular, get a "doctor" on Rogan's show who will reverse the target of that label, from its applicability to anti-vaxxers, to its applicability to the 90%+ who value facts and science above the opinions of a few entertainers who are heavily funded by a few rich folks who will get richer with the spread of COVID19.

[–]monkeymagic 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

you’re a fucking mark.