use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~9 users here now
Do you think quantum entanglement could be used to exchange information instantly?
submitted 27 days ago by FuckYourMom from self.whatever
Like drones, or stuff in mars, or live tv m?
[–]IkeConn 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun - 26 days ago (0 children)
That is 20 years into the future...and always will be.
[–]iDontShift 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 26 days ago (0 children)
einstein said nothing is faster than light
einstein destroyed Tesla's ether by that claim
here we have proof of faster than light transmission
unfortunately 'outer space' is part of einstein's school of bullshit
[–]lessalarming 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 24 days ago* (0 children)
The last question by Isaac Asimov was fundamentally about a "quantum computer." That creates the universe in order to answer the last question.
When the last white is no more the answer will have been found.
The Last Question
Fucking Whitey...every time
[–]lessalarming 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 27 days ago (0 children)
They have been using lasers to keep quantum networks entangled from low earth distances of 5-10Km...looks as though they've found an easier way.
If they can maintain a network's quantum entangled state then the computer can be as big as the solar system itself. So, you could essentially talk, video, email, run software, everything the same as on earth as on mars (no unnecessary gaming lag too!)
Ground-to-satellite quantum teleportation
[–]yabbit 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 26 days ago (1 child)
I'm a genius physicist so I'm the perfect person to ask.
[–]harley 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 26 days ago* (0 children)
i have a neighbor that tells everyone that he knows all about physics, but then he says that he doesnt like to talk "tech".
i would think that if someone is really well educated about physics that he should be able to hold his weight in just about any tech conversation. is this correct?
what would be a good question that isnt too complex about physics to stump him about physics?
i am looking for a good question that anybody that really knows physics would know... but that he wont understand how to answer..
[–]fatman 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 25 days ago (1 child)
I thought there was some theorem that said its impossible to send bits of information via entanglement, or as soon as you send the first bit then you lose the quantum entanglement, or something like that...
[–]lessalarming 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 24 days ago (0 children)
The Theoretical Minimum
Don't get caught in terminology...everything is a model...often when people are talking part of a part of a model.
So, to talk of the premise of all models of physics they begin with describing all these "sets"...and then go into part of parts of models in the describable sets.
FYI, I think you're pointing to Heisenbergs Uncertainty principle and Shrodinger's cat...which is about the double slit experiment...and looking into the atom (or box to see the cat) and whether it is in slot A or slot B in the double slit experiment.