you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

but you are partially misrepresenting users, such as /u/JasonCarswell, /u/Earendil, /u/diogenesjunior, and /u/Popper

Partially? Almost fully in the case of all users listed, if not 100% with users like Dio (PoS), Popper & Jason. Jason asked an innocent question as he always does lol, "Jason's morale is falling, he's beginning to question you!" (Jason has questioned everything with honest intentions since day 1, I admire that about him), he's doing this shit so vulnerable users who aren't familiar with SaidIt's core user-base or their opinions flip. But he's failing terribly.

But he's getting paid so fuck it, rite?

As a whole, we need to start ignoring these posts. If no one responds to these, they'll be a wasted effort.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Agreed. 'Partially' was used in the British sense of the term, which can mean 'almost fully'. Like when one says, 'that's not very good', which means that it's potentially absolute bollocks.

I'm just curious.

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[removed]

    [–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    That screenshot selectively omitted and carefully avoided showing my comment directly following that one stating that you are a psychological operation who "wants to destroy SaidIt". I've even gone so far as to stat that every one "should do your best to pay no mind to the professional psychological manipulators."