If you’re against Biden…

submitted by SavingSaidIt from self.whatever

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (15 children)

/u/magnora7 or /u/TheAmeliaMay or /u/d3rr - would you know approximately how many new accounts there are that have been created in the past few days - that are chatting with each other and upvoting that person's (or those two or three users') posts - in an efford to create unnecessary drama on Saidit?

[–]Tom_BombadilBombadildo 11 insightful - 5 fun11 insightful - 4 fun12 insightful - 5 fun -  (3 children)

This is like shill inception.

Flagrant pharma Shill (/u/socks) asking questions about other sock puppet account shills.

Bill Gates's money seems to be everywhere these days, and this money is here to save the day.

/s

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[removed]

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Only on Saidit, apparently

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Derpity do da

    [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 5 fun -  (6 children)

    Yes, we're feeding all of the data into the great banhammer in the sky, as we speak

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

    Oh no! Please don't ban these lovely spammers. (What would Saidit be without them....) I was just curious about the number of alternative accounts per user, and how much each user is self-fellating their upvotes.

    [–]Debra_L 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    lol They've long been banned 10 times over, smartypants. See my thread here.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    Sorry - your 1-hour-old thread and your 4-day-old account could also be a misdirection. There's no evidence there that you have a dog in the hunt

    [–]Tom_BombadilBombadildo 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Sorry - your 1-hour-old thread and your 4-day-old account could also be a misdirection. There's no evidence there that you have a dog in the hunt

    The shameless pharma-shill pot calls his sock puppet black.

    I was just curious about the number of alternative accounts per user, and how much each user is self-fellating their upvotes.

    Amateur comedy.

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    yes, we all are

    [–]NodeThis is my flair. There are many like it, but this one is mine. 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    Great, I'm off to Cancún. Let me know when service is restored.

    (Not entirely joking - Levels of drama and shilling have exceeded usability thresholds)

    [–]magnora7 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

    About 3 dozen at the least, it looks like

    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    Eek!

    Cheers

    [–]magnora7 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Yeah it's a genuine attack, and Amelia has good reason to act like they have. But at the same time it's hard not to overstep, especially when they're deliberately trying to invoke such a reaction. But I think Amelia is going to step back a bit and also I'm able to be online more now that the Texas disaster is over

    [–]Akali 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

    It's true its unnecessary drama, but unnecessary drama is for the common folks what lightbulb are to moth so I don't think they are fake account.