you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (9 children)

Snowden is a limited hangout - he revealed NOTHING new, and Glenn Greenwald just handed over all the documents to his Intercept billionaire publisher with less than 10% of the leaks published. Further, Snowden does not condemn Greenwald nor the Intercept for dragging their feet, AND Snowden won't criticize the "official" narrative of 9/11 much less discuss the NDAA 2012 allowing domestic propaganda and psyops in the USA.

[–]ManWithABanana 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

Wow - Snowden really gets you going doesn't he ?

All I see from this guy is an intelligent man who did what he thought he needed to do, fled the country, and has to be super disappointed in what happened afterwards. I've read a ton of your comments and I'm not getting what your problem is with him.

Edit : I see now. You think he's a CIA asset. Did I get it right ?

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

Part 6

/u/Leo_Littlebook /u/JasonCarswell


So, we have congress pretending to end the retention of mass bulk data, thusly, assuring the utilization of backdoors via telecommunication companies who have had a long history of doing business with intelligence agencies.

And in a predictable move, Omidyar's errand boy to dupe, Glenn Greenwald, handler of Snowden, tricks his followers with the propaganda that these powers will be reduced.

So, Booz Allen limited hangout Snowden cheers on Rand Paul, thus promoting the filibuster psychological operation.

In 2015, congress wanted you to believe a filibuster would prevent the NSA from sending malware to targets. As we know, congress is incorporated and most of the policies and legislation passed or debated about would be disregarded by the surveillance apparatus anyway.

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/05/senates-excuses-reauthorizing-section-215-and-why-theyre-wrong

"This has been a very important part of our effort to defend the homeland since 9/11." —Sen. Majority Leader Mitch McConnell

There’s one problem: there’s no evidence to support that.

The President's Review Group on Signals Intelligence stated:

"Our review suggests that the information contributed to terrorist investigations by the use of section 215 telephony meta-data was not essential to preventing attacks."

The Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board stated:

Based on the information provided to the Board, including classified briefings and documentation, we have not identified a single instance involving a threat to the United States in which the program made a concrete difference in the outcome of a counterterrorism investigation. Moreover, we are aware of no instance in which the program directly contributed to the discovery of a previously unknown terrorist plot or the disruption of a terrorist attack.

Mitch McConnell, Richard Burr, Eric Holder, Loretta Lynch, James Clapper, Tom Cotton and Mike Pompeo, among others ardently supported the reauthorization of section 215.

Filibustering is akin to voting. In that like Rand Paul, we rely on a single action, however prolonged in believing that said action will fix the issues of our time, the people never once consider that maybe voting or filibustering, say the Patriot Act, does not really contravene with the corporation of the UNITED STATES. Concerning the processes of the corporation, no matter the obstructions they allow, no matter whether you think your vote will somehow stick it to the man, you are still encouraging the very system to flourish.

"large amounts of metadata gives the government access to even more revealing portraits of individuals/groups..."

https://t.co/Kk7NNqTpV4?amp=1

And reading between these lines, someone, some entity, wants Americans to believe that the NSA will stop routing internet traffic through their data centers and that Snowden is a hero.

Yet, it is quite clear that a persons' digital internet footprint is exponentially larger than their telecommunications footprint. Just think about all those images, messages, emails, posts, tweets, likes, searches, histories, purchases, accounts, memberships, subscriptions etc.

"...but it is virtually impossible to make a call on normal phones without generating an Amdocs record of it..."

http://t.co/K4lkyk3nLb?amp=1

Substantiated by this PsyOp:

"...certain suspects in 9/11 may have managed to stay ahead of them by knowing who and when investigators are calling on the telephone..."

Think about the Israeli art students who lived in close proximity to the 9/11 alleged hijackers, think about Amdocs, think about paper patsies!

"...virtually all call records and billing in the USA are done for the phone companies by Amdocs—an Israeli-based private telecom company..."

"NSA issued a report (TS/SCI) warning that records of calls in the United States were getting into foreign hands—in Israel—in particular..."

"...widespread data mining techniques and algorithms—combining both the properties of the customer and properties of the specific behavior..."

"...USA government officials are worried about the possibility that Amdocs data could get into the wrong hands—particularly organized crime..."

Here one can observe that Israeli owned private companies are being blamed to counter information which exposes domestic spying operations. If the UNITED STATES corporation & company is truly concerned about Israeli intelligence, they would cut ties with sharing personal information with them. The fact is that the Israeli intelligence agencies work hand-in-hand with American intelligence agencies and telecommunication companies, many fronted by dual-Israeli citizens.

Snowden was a teenager when Carl Cameron authored his 2001 report on the Israeli art student spy ring but give Snowden credit for telling us the NSA has been collecting metadata since 9/11 ignoring Amdocs who was collecting metadata before 9/11 and who shared intelligence with US intelligence agencies. So, rest be assured, the NSA has a back door into Amdocs or Amdocs has a back door into the NSA, either way bulk collection of metadata continues.

And we must take into account that nowadays all these wireless broadband satellite telecom data software service companies rely more and more upon cloud-based platforms, which can easily be monitored. And remember too that the FREEDOM Act is a diversion. It does not end bulk collection of metadata it just rewrites the rules of the game for the NSA.

What has Snowden leaked about Amdocs, Comverse, ICTS, Kroll, TriData, MITRE, Ptech, the Dancing Israelis and the Israeli art student spy ring? Nothing. He has leaked nothing, he only perpetuated the 9/11 official government approved conspiracy theory -- a limited hangout, who has stated numerous times that the classified information will remain classified indefinitely. Greenwald sought it to that end and now makes star appearances on Fox News, the same corporate news company which covered-up 9/11.

And when you finally understand that 9/11 was a false flag operation orchestrated by a 5th column within the UNITED STATES corporation, specifically the executive branch, riddled with Zionist neoconservatives as well as pro-Likudnik factions within US intelligence agencies and private companies who were contracted to coordinate the event, you will realize that the Islamaphoiba after 2001 was a desired goal and that the data mining to combat the faux existential threat of domestic radical Islamic jihadis -- terrorists hiding around every corner -- was concocted to erect an unconstitutional surveillance system that allegedly permeates every facet of our world today.

As for the controlled opposition media pundits, they too perpetuate the memes and terms such as beheading, homegrown, lone wolf, terrorist sympathizer, ISIS, AQAP Islamists, etc., a clear perception management campaign perpetuated by ZeroHedge, the Drudge Report, etc.

But of course this scare could be exaggerated concerning the belief that the government watches everything you do. No. The government, intelligence agencies, limited hangout agents deliberately scared Americans in order to sell you software to 'protect' yourself. What better way to open up a security niche market worth billions! Snowden knows a lot about that scheme for he shilled for various Department of Defense backed encrypted apps. €¥¥€£¥€£££€€!

Likewise, it is also clear that people like eBay and First Look Media founder Pierre Omidyar, Glenn Greenwald's mentor as well as Glenn Greenwald himself, handler of Snowden are no different than Glenn Beck and Alex Jones in pushing an agenda to sell you crap.

https://mobile.twitter.com/the_intercept/status/601799151609851904

"...thanks to the Snowden PSYOP the Western spies and tech giants continue to meet in secrecy to discuss how to save the surveillance-state..."

^ ^ ^ That is the PsyOp.

Are we to believe that because of Snowden, because of filibustering the NSA is going to close all its back doors into the telecom-metadata-surveillance matrix? That's exactly what they want you to believe.

Ask yourself this: why must Snowden "screen everything before releasing it to journalists" such as Greenwald and his billionaire boss Omidyar, whilst they keep classified documents classified. And how nice, oh how nice indeed of you ‪Snowden‬ to provide the Alphabet Agencies with a list of "dissidents" aka followers on your blue labeled Twitter account.

Yes, the very "whistleblower" who leaks secret government files and lives at an "undisclosed location" managed to secure a verified account?

I have plenty more to post.

[–]ManWithABanana 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

So, we have congress pretending to end the retention of mass bulk data, thusly, assuring the utilization of backdoors via telecommunication companies who have had a long history of doing business with intelligence agencies.

Yup. Depressing as all get out.

In 2015, congress wanted you to believe a filibuster would prevent the NSA from sending malware to targets.

You have to remember that Congress is made up of individual actors. It's not some kind of monolith.

As we know, congress is incorporated

Yeah I know. THEY pull their strings. I've heard this before.

most of the policies and legislation passed or debated about would be disregarded by the surveillance apparatus anyway.

I think this is much more complicated than this blithe assertion. Beliefs like the above actually help the surveillance state immensely.

And when you finally understand that 9/11 was a false flag operation orchestrated by a 5th column within the UNITED STATES corporation, specifically the executive branch, riddled with Zionist neoconservatives as well as pro-Likudnik factions within US intelligence agencies and private companies who were contracted to coordinate the event, you will realize that the Islamaphoiba after 2001 was a desired goal and that the data mining to combat the faux existential threat of domestic radical Islamic jihadis -- terrorists hiding around every corner -- was concocted to erect an unconstitutional surveillance system that allegedly permeates every facet of our world today.

The simpler explanation is usually the correct one. 9/11 happened because of Islamic extremists. CIA/NSA/Cops want to look at your digital evidence. These things can exist independently.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

You have to remember that Congress is made up of individual actors. It's not some kind of monolith.

Congress members, in the house and senate are members of a corporation, ie., the US Federal Corporation, whoch is written in legal code and are traded on Wallstreet. Why do you think Biden said to a gun owner a few weeks ago on video that he "doesn't serve him," you'd think he would at least lie and say he served the people, but this isn't the case when you consider that they, presidents, are chartered as EO's of a federal corporation. Look up TheCaptainSlappy videos for more info on this. Slappy shows with proof in 16th, 17th, 18th, 19th and 20th century documents, documents nobody cares to read, certainly not truth Inc., nor the faux conspiracy theoretician crowd, that the US is a corporation and always was. It was a protection racket built to protect the founders assets, that the poor produced. Later on, it had some semblence of representation for the people, ie., certain founders like Jefferson, who critiqued the constitutional conventions, found that the Bill of Rights had to be added for the protection of the farmer and common person, but todays corporatists, their lackey corporate lawyers; politicians, Zionists in congress, bankers, and thr BAR association (corporation) all but threw out the constitution.

EO's of the US corporation do not care about the constitution and never will. Like Bush said:

It's just a piece of paper.

And for this belief, prominent in the upper wealthy classes and industrialist sphere we now have lovely permanent public debt, that is mortgaged to unborn generations. We can thank the Jew Hamilton, the Jew Warburg, thr Jew Seligman, who convinced Warburh to push for income tax, the Jew Schiff, the Jew Rothschild whose lackey was Belmont (a fake name; and a Jew) and the Jews Legman, Guggenheim and Loeb.

Again, this isn't a blame on every Jew. Context is key here. The anti-farmer belief, that remained prominemt in neoliberal, Industrial and political circles allowed foreign bankers to travel to the US and take over the US through permanent public debt.

The simpler explanation is usually the correct one. 9/11 happened because of Islamic extremists. CIA/NSA/Cops want to look at your digital evidence. These things can exist independently.

Usually. Not always. The offical sanctioned government narrative, if we were to take into account all the laws of physics broken and the utter impossibilities and laughable pre-written back stories, I think you would come to the conclusion that 9/11 was an inteliigence agency job. Italian intelligence has admited many times that 9/11 was a Mossad/5th column Likudnik/neoconservative job.

My evidence? I invite you to read and watch:

  • Any of David Chandlers videos on WTC7.

  • Read the Fairbanks study on WTC7

  • Read any of the books and the technical data published by architects and engineers for 9/11 truth.

  • Read Graeme MacQueen's book on the Anthrax attacks which were part and parcel of the 9/11 false flag.

  • Read John MacDonald's Civic investigation book on the Israeli families that boasted about 9/11 and made money off of it after the fact.

  • Read the hundreds of FBI documents that investigated the "dancing Israelis" and the hundreds of Israelis caught on 9/11 who celebrated and boasted about 9/11 before and after the fact. The document refers to 9/11 as the "Twin Tower Bombing."

  • Search: newsfocus.org; scroll down on that website and click the article referring to PNAC. That article illustrates the neocons involved.

  • Search Christopher Bollyn, and above all read David Ray Griffin's books.


9/11 happened because of Islamic extremists.

If you read these books and research the evidence, for years, as I have done, you might come to an entirely different conclusion. That, like what Italian intelligence has said for years, that 9/11 was a professional job, not done by patsy hijackers who had mossad handlers in Hollywood, Florida but by a tightly knit group of Likudnik aligned Zionists/neocons and MIC aligned politicians that sought to profit off of and use the pretext for geopolitical agendas.

[–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

TheCaptainSlappy videos

Are painful to watch. You need a better reliable source that doesn't hurt.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Listen, they might be painful, but you are not suppose to watch them, but read the pictures and documents. He does the shit editing as a joke because he tried hard before to teach people and nobody cared so he says, if someone really wants to know the truth they have to pause the video and read. If they cannot do this for the shitty editing reasons, then they don't want the truth. He says, they have to try for it.

Again, all the truth is in charter documents and law books before the 19th century. His older videos did not have the dumb editing. What Cappy basically proves is that the US is a corporation and congress is a corporation and the US and Freemasonic charter corporations are ALL ABOUT MONEY FLOW and protection rackets.

Life for all of them is GAME THEORY. It is that simple. That's why complaining about your rights won't solve a damn thing.

[–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

IMO, he'd be better off/more effective adding all that information to a nice archive-ish site of his own or better: WikiSpooks - and maybe bundling it all into torrents to be shared (perhaps with monthly or seasonal updates). The he could make his videos to promote his info-exposure-release-updates - or IMO more effectively just promote it on SaidIt and save his video-making time for original content like contextual breakdowns, video essays, opinions, parodies, etc.

" Life for all of them is GAME THEORY. "

Truth. For the most of rest of us on Earth it's still a matter of scraping by for life and death.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I would send you all the law books and documents that were sent in a comment to me by Slappy but I check today and YouTube freaking deleted the comment for good. Why delete the comment? It seems that is too close to truth. Basically, EVERY COUNTRY is a LLC.

[–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Nothing is simple.