you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]LabTech 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

I thought Tulsi just said she was done with the Democrats; that doesn't automatically mean she's joined the Republicans. It doesn't preclude it, but it doesn't automatically lead to it.

HAS she declared for the Republicans? She only just gave her announcement like 2-3 days ago.

[–]chickenz 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

She is very intelligent and speaks well.

But I don't trust her intentions.

These demotards are scrambling, they are desperate.

Perhaps it is possible that miss Tulsi is acting as a double agent.

[–]LabTech 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Apparently she's a WEF plant, but if she is one she's DEEP undercover aside from a few conservative unfriendly positions, which she'd basically HAVE to adopt as a Democrat.

Honestly, her then claiming that she's going over to the Republicans would be far too obvious a move. I think she'd do much more work remaining in the middle and spreading messages that with a little work, the Democratic party might be redeemed, or something like that.

[–]aaarrgh 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

can you ever trust a politician?

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

"Independent"?

[–]LabTech 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Well, there's being independent of the Democratic party, and being a member of the Independent party, which is just the biggest of the third parties.

I think so far she's small I independent, in that she's currently unaffiliated.

Doesn't mean she's any more or less trustworthy; now that she's ostensibly free and clear of official entanglements, it's time to really focus in on her actions and statements.