you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]hfxB0oyA 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Even if he is a sexual degenerate, consider the following:

  1. He was telling a lot of hard truth about people who don't like their actions to be seen in the light of day.
  2. Those same people were all over the Jeffery Epstein client lists, and they were engaging in sexual degeneracy on a scale that makes the accusations against him seem like a day in the park. Where is the media outrage about that?

[–]Anman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Even if he is a sexual degenerate

So, you are going to accept a degenerate just because they did something good? (Or perceived to be good, because really he has achieved absolutely nothing)

That is how all evil works. On the surface good deeds and bright lights, behind the scenes evil and darkness. If you tolerate anyone who is built on a foundation of evil because of their non evil actions, then you are accepting those evil actions.

[–]hfxB0oyA 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You set a pretty high bar for invalidating everything a person contributes based on their flaws. Why believe anything from anyone, then?

[–]Anman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There exists a global moral baseline, many people follow it. But you are right. In today's age at least 90% of people are have no moral value and thus should not be lifted up above others. Probably less than 0.01% are examples of good valued people.