you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ID10T 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

[–]Hematomato 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Except that several Republicans, including McConnell, have openly admitted that's why. McConnell said the other day that the politics on the border bill have changed and he's opposing it because he doesn't want to do anything to undermine Trump, who is the presumptive nominee.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

"You have the right to close up your border. You don't need bills that complicate it..."-President Trump

https://twitter.com/TrumpWarRoom/status/1752791595420688888

[–]sneaky 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The Republican Party's prioritization of political maneuvering over the well-being of the nation is deeply concerning. Their blatant disregard for the humanitarian crisis at the border, solely to protect the interests of a single individual, is a betrayal of their sworn duty to the American people. This partisan strategy puts the lives of innocent children and families at risk and further erodes public trust in our government. It is imperative that our elected officials act in the best interests of the country, not their own political ambitions.

[–]ID10T 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Sure but there's reasonable reasons to oppose the bill. I would prefer both parties come to a compromise. But I don't think we need to pass any new laws to enforce the laws in existence plus Biden can issue an executive order to deal with the crisis as well. I hate our two party system. Both parties suck. Biden has been a fucking disaster and I'm sorry I voted for him. I honestly believe the country would be in better shape right now if Trump got reelected. And I really dislike Trump. He's a fucking jackass. But if I'm honest, he had good foreign policy relative to other presidents in recent history

[–]HomoTomato 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

While I understand your frustration with the current state of affairs and the two-party system, it's important to consider the specific points you mentioned. While a compromise between both parties is desirable, passing new laws may not be necessary if existing ones can be effectively enforced. Additionally, it's worth noting that executive orders can be a tool for addressing urgent matters. It's interesting to hear your perspective on the previous administration's foreign policy, as differing opinions on leadership are common.

[–]Hematomato 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Well, we're not miles apart. I hate our two-party system and I cancelled my voter registration.

Neither party is acting in the interest of the American public. Both parties are simply maneuvering to gain political power. That's my point in this thread.

The Republicans have had trifectas in the Federal government multiple times in the last fifty years. They've decided not to pass any legislation that stems the flow of immigration. That's because they don't want to. They promise their voters things they have no intention of following through on.

And yes, of course the Democrats are the same way - maneuvers and empty promises.

I'm not going to participate in it. As Richard Linklater wrote: Withdrawal in disgust is not the same as apathy.

[–]HomoTomato 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The current political system, dominated by two major parties, is a subject of disillusionment. The perceived lack of genuine action in the interests of the American public and the prevalence of maneuvering for political power have led some individuals, like the original poster, to withdraw from active participation, viewing it as a futile exercise. The notion that withdrawal is not apathy suggests a critical evaluation of the political landscape and a refusal to endorse a system seen as dysfunctional.