all 5 comments

[–]SMCAB 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Yeah, except we aren't. Back then, we all had the same weapons. Populace has no wherewithal to do anything but light fireworks and fight about fags. When the answer has ZERO violence and can be achieved with immediate results, and everyone can participate, but good luck with that.(Not OP, just in general)

[–]turtlew0rk 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Also zero microaggressions and of course it would have to be trans friendly. Also it should promote equity so there should be limited white reprepresention meaning of course white women. White men would qualify as micro-aggressions so naturally they are out altogether.

Other than that we are in. Although we should probably rename the movement. 1776 seems white-supremacy ya know?

[–]SMCAB 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Of course.

[–]binaryblob 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Yawn is probably not the reaction these people were looking for, but "Yawn". Sorry, marketing people. Try again?

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

no but you don't understand we totally-not-glowies are super serious you should be thinking about armed rebellion right now!