all 6 comments

[–]Hematomato 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I think fundamentally we have three options as a society:

  1. Have public schools for people who are poor and private schools for people who are rich;

  2. Subsidize private schools so poor people can send their kids to different kinds of schools;

  3. Ban private schools entirely and have only public schools.

Davis-Gates clearly opposes option #2 (as do I), but it's not at all clear from a two-sentence post on X whether she favors 1 or 3.

[–]passionflounderIndependent 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

She admits that she's a racist then?

[–]IkeConn[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yes, in her words. Yes.

[–]passionflounderIndependent 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Words and actions.

[–]LordoftheFlies 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Well of course she sends her kids to private schools, it's fucking Chicago. Have you seen some of the socially-maladjusted failures that they have attending public schools there?

[–]SoCo 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The issue:

Terrible public schools wouldn't keep getting money to waste being terrible and dangerous, if people who were forced to go to private schools, wouldn't keep giving their government education money to that terrible public school in their district, but instead took their gov ed. contribution with them, to where they went with a voucher.