Found and Not Found at Ground Zero

submitted by Tarrock from media.communities.win

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]package 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Here's a fun experiment you can do: drive a car as fast as it can go, directly into a wall. Have someone check and see how damaged your driver's license, which was in your wallet and pocket, is from that impact. The results may surprise you.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Oh fun, a disengenuous argument made by a smug sheep. Why don't you run that experiment and demonstrate how an engine can disappear from existence?

Or we can take a look at the footage of the crash and and fireball and realize that the probability that all of the improbable occurances required for the official story to be true all happening is infinitesimaly small, yet the probability that the government has lied, yet again, is a near certainty.

[–]package 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

demonstrate how an engine can disappear from existence?

Demonstrate how what must have been a missile the size and shape of a plane disappears from existence.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The missile nor the hole it made are the size or shape of an airplane, and is loaded with explosives that disintegrate it.

[–]package 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Dude, again, there was unquestionably a plane sized and shaped object that hit the tower. There is a ton of footage of the thing, from various sources, from various angles. The impact site is very elliptical despite the angle at which it hit, as one would expect from a plane shaped object. If you want to deny that you are reaching flat earth levels of denial and gangstalking levels of psychosis.

Like legit, what is your argument? That every single witness, both civilian and media-affiliated, lied? That in 2001 the government somehow altered all the video feeds from all live cameras, and then manufactured civilian footage from actual people that do exist, to show a realistic plane shaped object instead of some sort of magic missile that completely vaporizes itself, and coordinated with every single on scene reporter to lie about what they are seeing? That an engine, made of many small parts and not particularly dense for its size, would not be torn up and chewed to shit by not only an impact with a skyscraper, but the entire mass and momentum that skyscraper breaking into pieces and collapsing onto it, impacting it not only in the air, but on the ground? That such a force would not be many times that of a missile weak enough to produce such a relatively small explosion?

edit: look up flight 1771 for an example of how thoroughly a plane can break apart by impacting just the ground, without also being crushed by a falling skyscraper

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Dude, again, there was unquestionably a plane sized and shaped object that hit the tower.

The missile hit the pentagon.