Found and Not Found at Ground Zero

submitted by Tarrock from media.communities.win

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Canbot 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The point being made is obviously not dependent on the literal interpretation of indestructible. If one talks in disingenuous arguments they should be prepared to look a fool at the end of one.

[–]Zapped 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Indestructible (or the misspelling of indestructable) is in the picture. It is a claim that is a lie. If you add lies to an argument, or even make weak arguments, you can't expect people to follow any other arguments or claims you make.

[–]Canbot 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If you add lies to an argument, or even make weak arguments, you can't expect people to follow any other arguments or claims you make.

It's not a lie, those things should have been found. The black box in particular. The engines are meaningless in the case of the towers, but the lack of engines at the pentagon is very strange.

You don't "disbelieve" because of that claim. You are using it as an excuse attack the argument without providing any real rebuttal. Your bullshit is transparent. You aren't nearly as clever as you seem to think you are. You aren't fooling all the people you think you are fooling.

The absurdity of the official claim that passports were recovered unscathed while the black box was destroyed is compelling evidence that the official story is bullshit. Weasels like you can't "debunk" that with your pathetic ad hominems.