you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Canbot 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

The study wasn't "aimed" at anybody, it's just a scientific study. This leftist claim that science that contradicts thier ideology is somehow racist and therfore invalid is just science denial.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I would differentiate a scientific study, by scientists, and a propaganda piece by a right wing thing tank.

A right wing think tank could do a scientific study, but it would be published in a scientific journal, and be subject to peer review.

And it wouldn't start "Chief diversity officers (CDOs), who typically advance a leftist agenda, ..." if it's going to be published in any scholarly journal of standing.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The problem with that these days is that the journals have been corrupted and only print leftist papers. Science is not that which the leftist gatekeepers say is science, it is everything that follows the scientific method. This 100% qualifies. Denying science because of who produced it is still science denial. And your bias is blatant and foolish.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's obviously not a scientific study, and it's obviously for the purpose of pushing propaganda.