H.R. 127: A New Bill In Congress Would Literally End Your 2nd Amendment Rights Permanently

submitted by MarcoPolo from endoftheamericandream.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (23 children)

Obviously, to do this:

Provide for the licensing of firearm and ammunition possession and the registration of firearms, and to prohibit the possession of certain ammunition.

Would not:

Literally End Your 2nd Amendment Rights Permanently

Better title:

H.R. 127 could require a firearm and ammunition license and registration, while prohobiting access to certain ammunition

In any event, the NRA will lobby, disinformation, and misinformation this to death. Congresspeople will be saying to any donor who will listen: how much is it worth to you to make this go away?

[–]NodeIndependent 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Any restriction on gun ownership is illegal.

[–]Zahn 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes this. Registries don't reduce crime, so they serve another purpose entirely. Most people who are not familiar with this sort of thing are easily mislead by Gov/corp propaganda into thinking it actually does something besides encroach on our civil liberties.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Nope, important changes since 1791 include:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_law_in_the_United_States

Additional updates:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Is is, illegal 100% under the land of the United States OF America. The US corp in the District of Columbia can ban all guns if they want as long as you're a citizen, meaning a limited liability member of the corporation, such as recieving privilages, etc. They cannot, however, if you refuse all privlages, take your gun or do anything about it.

[–]Bigs 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Yes, yes it would. You cannot say someone has a right to something, and then claim it's conditional on if some government employee approves of it or not.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

That ship has sailed:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_law_in_the_United_States

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Nah, this is latitudinarian lawyerly loopholes in action.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Works for the UK as well as Anglicans

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Still illegal if that person is NOT A PERSON. Just make sure you don't have any government privileges such as health care and your good.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It's treasonous. Here'a why... if progressives actually read the bill and understood law, which most don't, the United States under the bill would now own ALL firearms in order to protect your 2A FEDERAL "rights" only originally for courts & D.C. lol. That is that the CONSTITUTION does not apply to human beings, only US CORP and members and humans have the right to own weapons, period.

INSIDE & over-riding your state.

Which is not even remotely legal.

The terms are so vague, it is scary.

They did this same tactic in theSoviet Union, just saying.

"Federal non-power to regulate any weapons inside states." directly to "Federal ability for your person to reside inside D.C. probate courts to POSSESS ammunition or firearms."

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EtVrdT1WQAQVv-C?format=png&name=900x900

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EtVsktCXYAQOxTc?format=png&name=900x900

The dope cartels here are going to love this bill if it goes thru. SO MANY MURDERS.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yikes

[–]cisheteroscumNational Justice Party 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

H.R. 127 could require a firearm and ammunition license and registration, while prohobiting access to certain ammunition

Even if this is true, and it's all it does, it's completely unjustified. Why should the typical American want the government to do this and restrict their rights further?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

To avoid being attacked by assholes with guns? And if one is attacked, the ammunition and gun can be potentially traced to a registration database. Kind of like getting run over by a car, but someone sees a license plate and reportst that to the police, whilst you lay in a coma.

[–]Zahn 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Pragmatically speaking, they would not be able to trace anything. Thats just the excuse that they put in any over reaching legislation to convince dolts, that it serves a purpose. Recall, the "patriot act" was promoted with the excuse of combating muh teeeerrrism.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Let's say you shoot someone, throw the gun in a river; the gun is dredged up later and its registration number is the same as that for a person from whom you stole it. The police report of your theft indicates that you were a suspect in that theft, which included the gun. The ballistics tests for that gun and bullet found in or near the victim seem to match the gun and the bullet. Next thing you know, you're doing 20 nickles in San Quentin for 1st degree murder, and your roommate calls you sweet cheeks.

[–]Zahn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Let's say you grind the serial number off, renders your whole premise useless. Also, cops don't just dredge a lake without a tip...ie...the perpetrators confession, whereupon they're already screwed.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Except when it is DHS PsyOps like Pulse shooting. Why would we want the most murderous entity have a database and monopoly on guns? Makes zero sense to me. I'm not paying a tax to keep a gun I rightfully own.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Not necessarily a monopoly on the sale of guns. The control would be the same as your license and registration for your car.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Yes, and you want a bunch of Zionist criminals at the fed level regulating such?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I think Zionist criminals are happy to leave the administration of licenses for cars and guns to other people. Not much money in it.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nope, it would be at the FED level via compacting individuals. Plus, Zionists also line the local governments anyway.

[–]cisheteroscumNational Justice Party 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I don't want Pulse to be a gayop tho

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well it was. Dr. Lube and Angle COLON, the greatest characters in any PsyOp. But they added the gay ISIS shooter for good measure too which made it extra spicy.