H.R. 127: A New Bill In Congress Would Literally End Your 2nd Amendment Rights Permanently

submitted by MarcoPolo from endoftheamericandream.com

all 39 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]PeterBuilt 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

who needs guns? biden is so cool, he signed one of those executive orders that allows me to shit in the ladies room.

holy biden, thank you.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

This is such a manufactured problem, and I mean on both political sides. There was never any problem before this woke shit if a dad had to take his little girl into the women's room or a mom went into the men's room for her son.

Or if one gender's bathroom was out, people share.

[–]madcow-5 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think it started with some hoodrats beating the shit out of a not-so-passible trans woman after seeing her leave the women's restroom at a fast food place in VA like five or six years ago. Which, just like cat-calling, instead of the problem being cis white males, it's very clear who the problem was.

But otherwise, it's always seemed like if you remotely pass, people aren't going to notice, let alone care. If you don't, then you're not really "in danger" using the men's room.

[–]akkordeonplayer 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

When the men in skirts started sending rape and death threats to women who objected to pervs, that’s when it became a problem.

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

Holy shit. This is the spookiest bill ive ever seen.

Existing gun owners have 3 months to give the ATF the Make, Model, Serial Number, Owner's identity, Date acquired, Where it's stored, and Identity of anyone who it's loaned to. Violators face 1 to 40 years in prison.

This bill is too extreme to pass at this point, but this is our future. The gun grab is coming.

[–]turn_coat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Let em try to enforce it.

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Yah I think at that point it's either leave the country or from my cold dead hands.

[–]turn_coat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Leave to where?

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I dont know where everyone else is headed, but I bought a rental property outside of Zurich for when the shit hits the fan.

[–]turn_coat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Not every one can casually purchase a rental property in another country... although if you have the resources for that, you could be a valuable ally for burgeoning "right wing" groups in the united states that wish to see our republic restored.

[–]NodeIndependent 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

They'll bring a lot of other pressure on you before they storm your house.

[–]turn_coat 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

(((they))) can suck on some hot lead.

[–]NodeIndependent 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

We need to find a way to make the solution less 'manual'. That's the main reason it hasn't been implemented already.

[–]fred_red_beans 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

License requirements and being entered in a public national database reduces ownership of firearms from a right to a privilege.

[–]Bigs 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Exactly, and one which can be revoked.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (23 children)

Obviously, to do this:

Provide for the licensing of firearm and ammunition possession and the registration of firearms, and to prohibit the possession of certain ammunition.

Would not:

Literally End Your 2nd Amendment Rights Permanently

Better title:

H.R. 127 could require a firearm and ammunition license and registration, while prohobiting access to certain ammunition

In any event, the NRA will lobby, disinformation, and misinformation this to death. Congresspeople will be saying to any donor who will listen: how much is it worth to you to make this go away?

[–]NodeIndependent 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Any restriction on gun ownership is illegal.

[–]Zahn 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes this. Registries don't reduce crime, so they serve another purpose entirely. Most people who are not familiar with this sort of thing are easily mislead by Gov/corp propaganda into thinking it actually does something besides encroach on our civil liberties.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Nope, important changes since 1791 include:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_law_in_the_United_States

Additional updates:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Is is, illegal 100% under the land of the United States OF America. The US corp in the District of Columbia can ban all guns if they want as long as you're a citizen, meaning a limited liability member of the corporation, such as recieving privilages, etc. They cannot, however, if you refuse all privlages, take your gun or do anything about it.

[–]Bigs 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Yes, yes it would. You cannot say someone has a right to something, and then claim it's conditional on if some government employee approves of it or not.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

That ship has sailed:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_law_in_the_United_States

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Nah, this is latitudinarian lawyerly loopholes in action.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Works for the UK as well as Anglicans

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Still illegal if that person is NOT A PERSON. Just make sure you don't have any government privileges such as health care and your good.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It's treasonous. Here'a why... if progressives actually read the bill and understood law, which most don't, the United States under the bill would now own ALL firearms in order to protect your 2A FEDERAL "rights" only originally for courts & D.C. lol. That is that the CONSTITUTION does not apply to human beings, only US CORP and members and humans have the right to own weapons, period.

INSIDE & over-riding your state.

Which is not even remotely legal.

The terms are so vague, it is scary.

They did this same tactic in theSoviet Union, just saying.

"Federal non-power to regulate any weapons inside states." directly to "Federal ability for your person to reside inside D.C. probate courts to POSSESS ammunition or firearms."

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EtVrdT1WQAQVv-C?format=png&name=900x900

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EtVsktCXYAQOxTc?format=png&name=900x900

The dope cartels here are going to love this bill if it goes thru. SO MANY MURDERS.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yikes

[–]cisheteroscumNational Justice Party 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

H.R. 127 could require a firearm and ammunition license and registration, while prohobiting access to certain ammunition

Even if this is true, and it's all it does, it's completely unjustified. Why should the typical American want the government to do this and restrict their rights further?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

To avoid being attacked by assholes with guns? And if one is attacked, the ammunition and gun can be potentially traced to a registration database. Kind of like getting run over by a car, but someone sees a license plate and reportst that to the police, whilst you lay in a coma.

[–]Zahn 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Pragmatically speaking, they would not be able to trace anything. Thats just the excuse that they put in any over reaching legislation to convince dolts, that it serves a purpose. Recall, the "patriot act" was promoted with the excuse of combating muh teeeerrrism.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Let's say you shoot someone, throw the gun in a river; the gun is dredged up later and its registration number is the same as that for a person from whom you stole it. The police report of your theft indicates that you were a suspect in that theft, which included the gun. The ballistics tests for that gun and bullet found in or near the victim seem to match the gun and the bullet. Next thing you know, you're doing 20 nickles in San Quentin for 1st degree murder, and your roommate calls you sweet cheeks.

[–]Zahn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Let's say you grind the serial number off, renders your whole premise useless. Also, cops don't just dredge a lake without a tip...ie...the perpetrators confession, whereupon they're already screwed.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Except when it is DHS PsyOps like Pulse shooting. Why would we want the most murderous entity have a database and monopoly on guns? Makes zero sense to me. I'm not paying a tax to keep a gun I rightfully own.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Not necessarily a monopoly on the sale of guns. The control would be the same as your license and registration for your car.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Yes, and you want a bunch of Zionist criminals at the fed level regulating such?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I think Zionist criminals are happy to leave the administration of licenses for cars and guns to other people. Not much money in it.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nope, it would be at the FED level via compacting individuals. Plus, Zionists also line the local governments anyway.

[–]cisheteroscumNational Justice Party 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I don't want Pulse to be a gayop tho

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well it was. Dr. Lube and Angle COLON, the greatest characters in any PsyOp. But they added the gay ISIS shooter for good measure too which made it extra spicy.