Twitter: 'Louisville Will Burn' Doesn't Violate Rules

submitted by [deleted] from breitbart.com

all 13 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]StillLessons 11 insightful - 5 fun11 insightful - 4 fun12 insightful - 5 fun -  (7 children)

It doesn't violate the rules because Trump didn't say it. Had he said it, it would have been flagged with a warning at a minimum. Anyone care to disagree?

I'm not voting this election, because Trump does not represent my beliefs. I see neither candidate as productive. The reason I start this comment as I do is not because I am a Trump supporter. It's not about Trump. It's about consistency. Twitter, Facebook, Google, Reddit are enforcing their "rules" in an obviously biased and arbitrary manner. For this, they have lost all credibility. It would be the same if they were biased in the other direction. But they aren't. They have chosen a side, and are quite obvious in their partisanship.

[–][deleted]  (4 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

    My concern is that his EO will go nowhere and that it's just lip service. He could do a lot more, like treating Twitter like the terrorist organization it is, but he won't. He didn't bring jobs back like he said: outsourcing has increased and our factories are as dead as ever.

    [–]StillLessons 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    If the bias were in his favor, he wouldn't care. He's a politician. This is a useful issue for him to increase his power base.

    [–]IridescentAnaconda 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    Not voting either. Trump doesn't represent my belief system. He does pay lip service (only that) to the issue I care most about -- ending government overreach in response to the pandemic -- and in that respect I have more in common with his supporters than his detractors. But he's filled the swamp, not drained it, and I don't see that changing.

    But I can't vote for Biden either. An objectively terrible candidate, well into dementia, a history of drafting and/or supporting policies that hurt the very people we're told should be enthusiastic about his candidacy, and absolutely no vision or message beyond "I'm not Trump". I refuse to be gaslit by this absurdity.

    [–][deleted] 7 insightful - 5 fun7 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 5 fun -  (4 children)

    Section 230 no longer applies because they're not acting in good faith. Twitter is a terrorist organization. Seize their assets and charge their executives with treason.

    [–][deleted]  (3 children)

    [deleted]

      [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

      lol

      [–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

      /u/TheAmeliaMay 2020!!!

      [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      It would have to be after 2037 lol

      [–]hennaojichan 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

      Well, it violates my rules. Suspend Twitter and other similar sites until 2035.

      [–]Againstniggers 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (8 children)

      😮

      [–][deleted]  (7 children)

      [deleted]

        [–][deleted]  (2 children)

        [removed]

          [–]Happy_face_caller 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

          Stop tagging me stalkers

          [–][deleted]  (2 children)

          [deleted]

            [–]Againstniggers 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

            Cope