Police Officer of 15 years makes a video to other Police Officers telling them it's time to choose: "No Left v. Right, No Black v. White, Just Liberty v. Slavery, Lines Being Drawn, Time To Choose"

submitted by [deleted] from youtube.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]magnora7 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

When people are like "You HAVE to choose a side, right now!"

That's when you know it's time to walk away from the whole situation.

When there's two "sides", they are easy to control, and people can be led around by the millions because of their allegiance to their "side". This is how wars get traction. People supporting their "side" but really both sides are getting played by people orchestrating the conflict.

[–][deleted] 13 insightful - 2 fun13 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

He's actually suggesting a non-violent solution where "sides aren't being chosen or played", which is what he hinted at in his title. He's saying himself, and the majority of police know the laws they're being asked to enforce are wrong, and this is an important moment in time for our country. He's saying to fellow police that if they continue going down the path they're currently on (this one), it will result in violence.

By limiting people's freedoms and enforcing laws they don't have the right to enforce as he explains, they've already chosen a side. They just have to literally say "no" to enforcing laws that limit people's freedoms, even if it means losing their jobs. He's actually saying we have to stop with the sides BS, that's part of the title:

"No Left v. Right, No Black v. White, Just Liberty v. Slavery, Lines Being Drawn, Time To Choose"

When he says choose, he's asking the police what path they want to take their society down, and explains where this path they're currently on leads.

But ultimately, I do agree with you for most cases.

Edit: Looks like this thread has eyes on it.

[–]magnora7 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Thank you for clarifying what his actual message was, I had only read the title. I think that's a good message. People need to just wake up and think independently as much as possible. Not merely be a contrarian, but actually come to their own conclusions based on their own thinking. I can't imagine anything being more helpful than that over the long-term. The only thing that has the power to truly free humanity is humanity itself.

[–]comments 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

the majority of police know the laws they're being asked to enforce are wrong

also didn't watch, but if anyone wants to summarize, which laws is he referring to?

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Just watch from 1:00-3:00 minutes for the gist (really, the first 5 minutes is all you need, 1:00-5:00 he says everything there is to be said), he's talking about laws such as arrests for not abiding by the lock down, pulling people over to see if they're an essential worker with papers proving they are and if not, ticketing or arresting them (which he says his dpt is doing and he's seen happen many times), telling people they can't protest (freedom of assembly), telling people they can't go to church (freedom of religion), etc. He compares the way the police are currently acting to Nazi Germany's Gestapo. He goes through the constitution and lists some things they're being asked to enforce and explains how they go against The Bill of Rights.

[–]comments 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Thanks!

Which is why it seems like the correct thing is for people to be able to sue or press criminal charges or something against anyone who infects them or increases their risk of exposure or something, if this kind of "we have to keep people at home" doesn't work. The lockdowns really do increase people's safety, I can see why it's a problem from a rights perspective but the harm is real and it seems like everybody's happy to say "well whatever it's fine if you just die". No! It's not fine with me, wtf?! That's literally advocating for killing me! I want some sort of way to protect myself, those I care about, my city, my country, etc. "your freedom to swing your fist stops at my nose" and all that.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Well, if you and your family are self-isolating and sterilizing, aren't you protecting yourselves? The majority are isolating, most Americans favor a continued government lockdown, only 12% of the population feels the government is going too far (with similar numbers in other polls) - the media is blowing the amount of dissenters out of proportion (along with running an insane propaganda campaign which is why you and others feel the fear you do).

No matter what you believe, there's been a lot of suspect things with the stats and organizations relating to Coronavirus Pandemic. Why do we need the government to be our parents and force us to stay home? If this "pandemic" is really that bad and people still wanna go out, let them - if it's as bad as it's made out to be, they'll all die & you wouldn't have to sue them - it'd be Social Darwinism at work. Survival of the fittest, they were stupid and didn't listen, you weren't and did. And according to polls, that would be a small minority of the American Population - even the majority of the Canadian population is on-board with the quarantine due to the aggressive media campaign.

It's about the freedom to make that choice though. Between this, and ID2020, we are looking at a very scary future where "rights" and "privacy" are non-existent things. We have the constitution to prevent the government from taking away these rights, yet they still are attempting to, and not purely for your safety; they have their own agenda too.

"Give me liberty, or give me death"

Some people would rather die "free", than die a slave to their government. This is kind of like a canary for some people who are being red-pilled by this experience.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If its "real" then you can chalk it up to Natural Selection and Darwin.. if its not ( which it really isn't to begin with)- then you have just a normal day in the US. Freedom of choice is not on the Bill of Rights, but it is inalienable- and frankly one of the last rights we really have in this clown world. Choose to think for yourselves, and not what these assholes that don't and never have gave a shat about you tell you that chocolate pudding is now vanilla, this is the new norm so deal with it.

[–]comments 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

No, "you have to just stay home all the time if you don't want to get the plague, forever really" isn't acceptable to me, and infringes on MY freedoms. Going around spreading plague is the equivalent of spraying bullets out of your body everywhere you go, infecting and hurting people. It's swinging your fist into my nose, which you do not have the freedom to do. Don't choose a remedy for it that infringes on rights, glad we're looking out for that, but don't leave me without some remedy if somebody harms me, my loved ones, my city, my country, etc, in this way.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That would be the Bill of Rights sir.

[–]whereswhat 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Best comment I have seen on any site in awhile. Thank you.

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Yeshua tells us to be undivided. That means to have disicple, be responsible, aid those less fortunate, and above all, love.

Yeshua was executed for preaching truth; Romans and the levitical Jews and pharisees, divided, both called for his execution.

Undivided is the key to transforming your life and others for the better.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

See, I understand exactly what you're saying in this comment and I agree with the concept, but I also understand with the world as it is currently, this could never happen naturally, in the context you're speaking of. I'm also against globalism/ the "nwo" (the forced, unnatural union of the world by "elite groups" with an agenda), but understand the context of what you are saying and therefore agree with you.

However with the way I've been seeing users on SaidIt interpreting comments or content as of late (such as the above video), I'm sure your statement could get you attacked for being "globalist" or supporting "the new world order" (following the logic that was used in this thread), when you aren't and neither is your comment. You're talking about a pure unity that has no agenda other than the betterment of humanity (which unfortunately people would have to choose, and we've been so brainwashed to hate each other based on the color of our skin, this will take time or a miracle to happen), however many on this site wouldn't put that into context and just call you a globalist.

I don't understand why it seems like in the past couple of months, there have been new users here who don't put statements into their proper context, and adjust their views in examples like this; it is kinda hard to deny that humanity coming together naturally, with no agenda, would lead to a better world for all of us. But humanity being forced together by different elite groups, such as Zionists, or Jesuits, or whatever other groups you believe are currently pulling these strings, is not okay, and is not what you're talking about. I still wouldn't be surprised to see a user act as if you were talking about and supporting the latter, on SaidIt these days.

I wish this video didn't get taken out of context based on people misreading and misunderstanding the title, and I wish they actually watched it before commenting lol. Could have lead to a better discussion than what was had.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

There's been tons of users in the past week, it seems, that seem like they have ulterior agendas. Everyone has agendas, but not ulterior, and there has certainly been an uptick in pushing the partisan sides of many issues.

I posted about what Fauci was doing a few days ago; that the same people who are pushing the antibody FDA future "validated" diagnostic for COVID-19 are the same republicans and democrats and corrupt scientists; such as Weinstean, Durray, Steere, etc., who in the 90's falsified the ELISA test to pass off the fraudulent Lymerix vaccine which was pulled off the market via ultimatum because it caused horrible malignancies. They used that falsified test (raising the cutoff standard for antibody counts) to test the efficacy of the vaccine!!

How would one get an 85% effective fraudulent vaccine, you ask, on the market?

Easy. Change the case definition of borreliosis which plauges millions who are then misdiagnosed with Symptom based diseases for easy money siphoning. Those MS, LUPUS, and Lou Gehrigs societies of whose CEO's pay themselves millions on the backs of those sufferers.

The scammers knew that 85% of the sickest patenits for Borreliosis were immunocompromised! Low antibody counts, and 15% HLA-linked outcome Patients for borreliosis had high antibody counts!

The raising of the cuttoff allowed for them to deney 85% of the sickest patients. So, in europe even though tr particularly plasmids of thr strain B. Burgdorferi they were trying to patent was not in Europe, they nevertheless, immunized people with a fraud vaccine that dis cause poor outcomes in many of the immunized because they fuckig in injected a immuno-supressing borrelia protein, the OPPOSITE OF A VACCINE; told them to go oot in tr world and then when they got sick or were bot bu a tick come back and get tested with their manipulated diagnostic.

15% tessted positive. That means an 85% effective fraud vaccine if you leave out 85% of thr sickest.

They're setting up COVID-19 to do exactly the same!!

So refwe to this post, my post:

https://saidit.net/s/Coronavirus/comments/46wv/silent_carriers_in_theaters_once_a_vaccine_is/

See that deleted post by that new member named Card or something like that, he told me I'm a idiot and dupe for the democrats and used multiple ad hominems to discredit this post above. Why? What purpose? There's nothing democrat about it?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why? What purpose? There's nothing democrat about it?

Exactly!! This is what I'm talking about, it even happened in this thread - I've been seeing a bunch of users taking the message one is putting out (or an article, or a video), and acting as if its' (or they are) saying the opposite of what it is/they're actually saying, in hopes of dissuading further users from reading the original comment/content. Hoping to also potentially start a hate-train or discredit your account, minus the down-vote button.

Perfect response on your part in that thread you linked to btw.

fraudulent vaccine

Sounds a lot like Flu Vaccines given in the United States that have last year's influenza strain - from China. There are different strains of influenza, and the strain going around America is different than that going around China. If the flu has mutated and is a completely different strain, why get "immunized" with the old, less-mutated version of strain that isn't even "native" to (or currently making the rounds on) your land/nation?