you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Well it was just the two, now twenty three months ago. Doesn't this comment seem quite silly now that you know it was just two, twenty three months ago

[–]BISH 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

Doesn't this comment seem quite silly now

Nope. I'm loving it.

Two for you, is better than just one.

Thanks for sharing.

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

No problemo. It's two because the probable repeatable science showed that gained a critical threshold of immunity.

But, I bet you have your own studies, which you came across from within your bubble and selected because they aligned with your worldview.

It's fine no problem buddy, you wouldn't be the first to make that mistake. I'll just enjoy my fake fatal spike protein build-up or whatever.

[–]1Icemonkey 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

I literally thought you were being sarcastic with your first comment. Man, I am surrounded by retards.

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

A retard, eh. In that case it's going to be really easy for you to explain what I got wrong. Any minute now in fact

[–]1Icemonkey 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You already did. Keep writing.

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Wow so you determined I am a retard because of something I haven't typed yet?

Wouldn't it have been a lot easier for you to, instead of writing that, just point to one single thing I was wrong about? I don't know why you're finding it so hard