use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~3 users here now
Could X go bankrupt under Elon Musk?
submitted 5 months ago by ActuallyNot from self.news
view the rest of the comments →
[–]ActuallyNot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 5 months ago (9 children)
You claim that fooling people that all white people are Nazis increases General Motor's ESG rating?
How?
[–]WoodyWoodPecker 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 5 months ago (8 children)
By following CRT that blames white people for everything, it makes them woke and have a higher ESG rating so they can get more investors and financiers from Blackrock.
[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 5 months ago (7 children)
By following CRT that blames white people for everything, it makes them woke and have a higher ESG rating
Seems to be a chicken and egg thing here. Why don't they save money by not investing in fooling people that all white people are Nazis, and then their ESG rating would be related to other stuff that they do?
[–]WoodyWoodPecker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 5 months ago (6 children)
You just don't get it, either they are woke or lose investors and finances, and their stock tumbles. Disney and Netflix face the same problems, so they replace white characters with more diverse characters. Trying to be carbon neutral is expensive, calling white people Nazis is easier and cheaper to do.
[–]ActuallyNot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 5 months ago (5 children)
Why do the people giving the ESG ratings get their social policy background from Twitter?
Wouldn't some social anthropology field be more robust?
[–]WoodyWoodPecker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 5 months ago (4 children)
Social means Social Justice, which means being woke and the white people are evil NAZIs.
[–]ActuallyNot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 5 months ago (3 children)
Isn't it a political and philosophical theory that focuses on the concept of fairness in relations between individuals in society and equal access to wealth, opportunities, and social privileges?
[–]WoodyWoodPecker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 5 months ago (2 children)
No, it uses white privilege and calls all white people evil. There is nothing equal about it. Right now they turned on the Jews over Gaza.
[–]ActuallyNot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 5 months ago (1 child)
Can you link me to some social justice theory that discusses this "all white people are evil" thesis?
[–]WoodyWoodPecker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 5 months ago (0 children)
https://www.quora.com/Are-all-white-people-evil-even-white-children-If-so-what-should-we-do-about-them
https://nypost.com/2023/01/20/michigan-school-board-member-slammed-for-tweeting-whiteness-is-evil/
https://forge.medium.com/what-it-means-to-accept-that-youre-racist-fbeef3839e47
https://www.smh.com.au/culture/books/are-all-white-people-racist-why-critical-race-theory-has-us-rattled-20201105-p56bwv.html
https://www.nas.org/blogs/article/where_did_we_get_the_idea_that_only_white_people_can_be_racist
https://www.city-journal.org/article/no-to-the-politics-of-whiteness
Not only are white people considered evil but only white people can be racist. That's classic CRT and Social Justice right there.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]ActuallyNot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (9 children)
[–]WoodyWoodPecker 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (8 children)
[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (7 children)
[–]WoodyWoodPecker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (6 children)
[–]ActuallyNot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (5 children)
[–]WoodyWoodPecker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (4 children)
[–]ActuallyNot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (3 children)
[–]WoodyWoodPecker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]ActuallyNot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]WoodyWoodPecker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)