The year after Black Lives Matter protests, the S&P 100 added more than 300,000 jobs — 94% went to people of color

submitted by xoenix from bloomberg.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (22 children)

It's not positive. It means less jobs for white people.

Fewer jobs for white people.

A job is a job. It puts the same money into the economy whoever's doing it.

Not for Jews. They'll stay the ruling class no matter what.

It's the associations with underclass that is the cause of the problems.

Is a good thing.

Not in the big picture. It's the basis behind racial problems.

It literally saves lives.

By what mechanism?

[–]Ethnocrat 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (20 children)

Fewer jobs for white people.

English isn't my native language, so give me a break.

A job is a job. It puts the same money into the economy whoever's doing it.

I don't give a shit about GDP. I care about white well-being.

It's the associations with underclass that is the cause of the problems.

They are an underclass. They've been since ancient Egypt.

Not in the big picture. It's the basis behind racial problems.

Racial problems are caused by diversity.

By what mechanism?

Just look at interracial homicide statistics.

[–]MagicMike 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (13 children)

White people build countries and economies. There’s a reason the British once owned 40% of the globe: they were white and they executed felons, removing the low IQ criminal element to some extent.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

What happened?

Did they stop being white, or did they instigate a felon breeding program?

Australia's economy must be especially shit.

[–]blackpoop321 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

They let the bleeding-heart liberals make them feel bad about it and started letting negros in.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Really? When were the first black British people?

Because I'd always thought that the Roman invasions in the 2nd and 3rd century AD brought black people to Britain.

I'm pretty sure Septimius Severus was based in York for a bit about then.

[–]blackpoop321 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

That's not a thing. Exceptions, or minorities kept in check were never a problem. It becomes a problem when you let them band together and outbreed the natives. But you already knew that, didn't you Rabbi?

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Who was keeping Septimius Severus in check?

Who are the natives of Britain? The Picts?

[–]blackpoop321 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Is stupidity a clinical condition of yours? No offense but I don't think you have the intelligence required to entertain any sort of conversation.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Funny you should mention stupidity.

Carl Sagan's The Demon Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark was published in 1996, so the reference to the coming millennium ages it a bit, but it's timeless enough that it elucidates why people like yourself have reverted to lizard-brained heuristics:

I worry that, especially as the Millennium edges nearer, pseudoscience and superstition will seem year by year more tempting, the siren song of unreason more sonorous and attractive. Where have we heard it before? Whenever our ethnic or national prejudices are aroused, in times of scarcity, during challenges to national self-esteem or nerve, when we agonize about our diminished cosmic place and purpose, or when fanaticism is bubbling up around us - then, habits of thought familiar from ages past reach for the controls.

The candle flame gutters. Its little pool of light trembles. Darkness gathers. The demons begin to stir.

The cognitive dissonance you're feeling is because that you're arguing for a history of the UK that never happened.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

English isn't my native language, so give me a break.

Tbh it's a very nuanced point. You can probably use "less" for countable nouns, as you see it more and more.

But it amuses me in particular when talking to people who are worried about black people taking all the jobs if they make grammatical errors. Less amusing for people in their second language of course.

I don't give a shit about GDP. I care about white well-being.

Really? What's your first language?

They are an underclass.

Yeah, not so much

They've been since ancient Egypt.

There's no evidence of any historicity to Exodus. The story was created during the Babylonian exile, 597-539 BCE, maybe 6 centuries after exodus was set, assuming that exodus was set during the reign of Ramses II.

Racial problems are caused by diversity.

Not of itself. They're caused by diversity being associated with differences in social class.

Just look at interracial homicide statistics.

This is one of the things that is dissolved when you achieve social class equality between racial groups.

[–]Ethnocrat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

What's your first language?

Dutch.

Yeah, not so much

What do you mean?

There's no evidence of any historicity to Exodus. The story was created during the Babylonian exile, 597-539 BCE, maybe 6 centuries after exodus was set, assuming that exodus was set during the reign of Ramses II.

Why are you talking about Exodus? I'm talking about blacks. I think you're confused.

Not of itself. They're caused by diversity being associated with differences in social class.

That's just patently false.

This is one of the things that is dissolved when you achieve social class equality between racial groups.

I highly doubt that, and achieving social class equality between racial groups is literally impossible because racial groups are inherently different. I mean, the US government has already spent trillions trying to achieve just that and it's been a massive failure.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Why are you talking about Exodus? I'm talking about blacks. I think you're confused.

Is this the same conversation you're having?

Because you're not talking about blacks

Not for Jews. They'll stay the ruling class no matter what.

It's the associations with underclass that is the cause of the problems.

They are an underclass. They've been since ancient Egypt.

There's no evidence of any historicity to Exodus.

Why are you talking about Exodus? I'm talking about blacks.

[–]Ethnocrat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Not for Jews. They'll stay the ruling class no matter what.

Here I'm talking about Jews.

They are an underclass. They've been since ancient Egypt.

Here I'm talking about blacks.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

They are an underclass. They've been since ancient Egypt.

Here I'm talking about blacks.

Are you not following the conversation? The reason we were talking about underclass was because the Jews aren't.

Why are you talking about blacks? I think you're confused.

[–]Ethnocrat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Forget it.

[–]jet199 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That "fewer" thing is a myth.

Stop being an arsehole