you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]HiddenFox[S] 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

The funny thing about this CNBC article is they left out a part....

Musk tweeted:

Last night, car carrying lil X (his son) in LA was followed by crazy stalker (thinking it was me), who later blocked car from moving & climbed onto hood.

Legal action is being taken against Sweeney & organizations who supported harm to my family

[–]Drewski 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

What does that have to do with Elon's jet though?

Legal action is being taken against Sweeney & organizations who supported harm to my family

Supported harm to his family? All he did was post publicly available flight logs. For a "free speech absolutist" Musk seems fine with squashing speech he doesn't like.

[–]Aurelius 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Honestly, there's so many people who are so upset that he's allowing dissenting opinions that they don't mind violence against him, so I can understand why he did it. Banning accounts supporting pedophilia upset s lot of dangerous individuals.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

He banned Ye for irrational reasons too