use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~3 users here now
SOCKS IS BANNED.
submitted 1 year ago by JasonCarswell from saidit.net
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Zahn 6 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 5 fun - 1 year ago (8 children)
It was an oversight for me to paint this with such a broad brush stroke. Yet, Socks was okay injecting defenseless children with an experimental "vaccine". Many shills of his caliber echo this sentiment often. It is un-ethical to use the vulnerable and children as guinea pigs for corporate profiteering. Therefore, people who advocate for this then fail to measure up to a basic modicum of accepted universal human behavior that would protect vulnerable members of society from potentially or provably dangerous things. Hence, the deserved subhuman label.
It's a boring but rewarding hobby for me to spot shills in the wild. Sort of like bird watching perhaps. There are so many different varieties, tactics and flavors of forum community disrupters. But no Comrade, I have no interest in hunting down people that simply disagree. There is a time and space for everyone to co-exist peacefully with meaningful discussion. It's just that the "shills" do not understand this premise and cannot help themselves from infiltrating spaces that differ in beliefs from them with the intention of ruining these spaces for everyone.
[–]neomarxist_bullshit 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun - 1 year ago (7 children)
Yet, Socks was okay injecting defenseless children with an experimental "vaccine".
I see a lot of pro-Russian shills here and yet I don't stalk them like a lunatic, I just post what I have to say about it when I'm in the mood and then go outside.
It's a boring but rewarding hobby for me to spot shills in the wild.
Who do you think socks was hurting on this site that's full of anti-system people?
[–]Zahn 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun - 1 year ago (1 child)
pro-Russian shills
Being neutral about Russia or even expressing disagreement with Western hegemony doesn't equal pro-whatever and doesn't make the commenter a pro-Russian shill.
He was attempting to use the platform as a free advertisement for his twisted cookie cutter establishment narrative and thereby disrupting conversation. It was like having Snopes or Reddit immediately interjected into what would of been a meaningful discovery discussion. I don't mind disagreement, but Socks was such a preposterous normie level rebuttal, it was intellectually offensive. If we wanted to hear what Reddit-tards think, we' be on Reddit. We come here for a higher level of non-censored discussion. This is not a place for his type of pathological authoritarian ilk, and candidly speaking it's not at all welcome...by my standards. However, it was okay to a degree by M7. I understood and accepted M7's viewpoint on the Socks matter.
[–]neomarxist_bullshit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago* (0 children)
free advertisement for his twisted cookie cutter establishment narrative and thereby disrupting conversation
Same with Reddit. There are anti-vaxers, "racists" etc. who are "disrupting the conversation" as well and they would like to get rid of them.
We come here for a higher level of non-censored discussion. This is not a place for his type of pathological authoritarian ilk
We come here for a higher level of non-censored discussion.
This is not a place for his type of pathological authoritarian ilk
What an irony.
[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun - 1 year ago (4 children)
Everyone.
Regulars were fed up with his shit. New folks were turned off. Truth-seekers were confused by him. Lonely folks were finding solace in his sketchy conversations. And tyranny is seeking any reason to stomp us - including for advocating violence. And Quakers will be forever maligned via guilt by association.
[–]neomarxist_bullshit 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 1 year ago (3 children)
New folks were turned off.
How, if this is supposed to be a free speech site (or at least more free than Reddit)?
You either support free speech for everyone or you just want your own echo chamber.
[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun - 1 year ago (2 children)
It's never been a free-speech site. It's always been for free-thinking and truth-seeking. The problem is not "fear of different ideas" or echo chambers, as has been said to death. Bad faith liars and advocates for violence are not welcome.
[–]neomarxist_bullshit 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 1 year ago (1 child)
Bad faith liars
Isn't that just another label for "people I disagree with"? On Reddit they call them "racists", "homophobes" and such.
[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun - 1 year ago (0 children)
Bad faith liars Isn't that just another label for "people I disagree with"?
Isn't that just another label for "people I disagree with"?
No.
You should know there is a profound difference between someone who earnestly believes in a position with all its pros and cons and someone who deceives as a means to an end for whatever paycheck, zealot, or "justified" reasons they deem necessary.
On Reddit they call them "racists", "homophobes" and such.
I hope SaidIt is still better than Reddit where I refuse to spend time.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Zahn 6 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 5 fun - (8 children)
[–]neomarxist_bullshit 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun - (7 children)
[–]Zahn 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun - (1 child)
[–]neomarxist_bullshit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun - (4 children)
[–]neomarxist_bullshit 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (3 children)
[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun - (2 children)
[–]neomarxist_bullshit 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (1 child)
[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun - (0 children)