you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Zahn 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

pro-Russian shills

Being neutral about Russia or even expressing disagreement with Western hegemony doesn't equal pro-whatever and doesn't make the commenter a pro-Russian shill.

Who do you think socks was hurting on this site that's full of anti-system people?

He was attempting to use the platform as a free advertisement for his twisted cookie cutter establishment narrative and thereby disrupting conversation. It was like having Snopes or Reddit immediately interjected into what would of been a meaningful discovery discussion. I don't mind disagreement, but Socks was such a preposterous normie level rebuttal, it was intellectually offensive. If we wanted to hear what Reddit-tards think, we' be on Reddit. We come here for a higher level of non-censored discussion. This is not a place for his type of pathological authoritarian ilk, and candidly speaking it's not at all welcome...by my standards. However, it was okay to a degree by M7. I understood and accepted M7's viewpoint on the Socks matter.

[–]neomarxist_bullshit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

free advertisement for his twisted cookie cutter establishment narrative and thereby disrupting conversation

Same with Reddit. There are anti-vaxers, "racists" etc. who are "disrupting the conversation" as well and they would like to get rid of them.

We come here for a higher level of non-censored discussion.

This is not a place for his type of pathological authoritarian ilk

What an irony.