SOCKS IS BANNED.

submitted by JasonCarswell from saidit.net

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]magnora7 13 insightful - 5 fun13 insightful - 4 fun14 insightful - 5 fun -  (12 children)

Saidit doesn't allow advocating violence, and he was repeatedly advocating open and detailed violence against a specific person which is federally illegal.

[–]neomarxist_bullshit 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Can't say I know the context in this situation, but surely you can't take everything seriously? Is there no space for nuance? Stuff like that could be explained like a fantasy in one's head, something you don't seriously pay attention to.

If I say "someone should shoot Putin in the head", would I be breaking the rules too?

[–]socks-the-nigger 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

😯

[–]Node 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Even if a joke or non-serious, you'll get threats of a ban by m7 and other admins. That's why I quit using this site.

[–][deleted]  (8 children)

[removed]

    [–]Blackbrownfreestuff 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

    Did you read her comments? She was sick in the head with deranged anger fantasies about some fox news journalist. This ban might encourage her to get some psychological help.

    [–][deleted]  (6 children)

    [removed]

      [–]magnora7 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

      He didn't care about the rules in the first place, that's why he got banned...

      [–][deleted]  (2 children)

      [removed]

        [–]magnora7 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

        No he clearly broke the rules very obviously when he advocated for detailed murder and torture of a specific person. It's against site rules. Not sure why you are defending someone who was promoting torture and murder, putting saidit in jeopardy... why would you defend that?

        [–]Blackbrownfreestuff 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

        Socks never told me her preferred pronouns. It would be sexist to default to "he". Can you provide a source for socks' preferred pronouns? If so, I would be glad to use them.