SOCKS IS BANNED.

submitted by JasonCarswell from saidit.net

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]cisheteroscum 17 insightful - 8 fun17 insightful - 7 fun18 insightful - 8 fun -  (12 children)

Meh. Socks was an annoying shitlib maybe but at least voiced a different opinion. This site has a dearth of lefty schizos, socks made for good practice

[–]neomarxist_bullshit 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

at least voiced a different opinion

Pretty much. That's what the site is for, no? I don't understand how people don't get tired by the "mainstream" opinions on here like "Putin is based and Zelenskyy is a Nazi Jew".

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Truth is usually not something you want to get tired of?

[–]jet199 9 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

He could offer a different opinion but couldn't always back it up with an argument.

And that's when he occasionally used to descent into insults and accusations, sometimes at crazy levels out of nowhere.

[–]cisheteroscum 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah but thats what made him(?) the perfect foil for the average user here. It was like talking to a stereotypical midwit NPC

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[removed]

    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 5 fun3 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

    Read his comment history

    his
    his

    his

    [–]HibikiBlack 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

    He got banned for his low-level-pyramid-of-debate comments and being overall a shitty user. His opinions themselves mostly weren't the reason.

    [–]Blackbrownfreestuff 13 insightful - 4 fun13 insightful - 3 fun14 insightful - 4 fun -  (4 children)

    He got banned for his low-level-pyramid-of-debate comments and being overall a shitty user

    No she didn't. She got banned for breaking sitewide rules regarding advocating violence, specifically that she wanted to see Tucker Carlson murdered.

    [–]HibikiBlack 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

    Yeah, but the fact that he had a long record of being a shitty user played a huge role. I've occasionally unintentionally broke similar rules myself but I always listen after being warned about it.

    [–]magnora7 10 insightful - 5 fun10 insightful - 4 fun11 insightful - 5 fun -  (1 child)

    Yes that's the thing, he's advocated specific violence at least 3 separate times in just the last few months. And not just a passing mention, but long detailed passages about how specifically he's going to torture a specific person. I gave him numerous chances because I realize the value a long term user like him brings to the site, but at the same time we can't have people blatantly breaking rules around here just because they've been here a while.