you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (15 children)

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

I guess he's guilty of all of his guest's inaccurate statements. This is called journalism, I know it's been a while since you've seen it.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Comments by Rogan are at the first link.

[–]rubberbiscuit 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Saying that children don't need the vaccines is your evidence of misinformation. That's all any of us need to know about your argument.

[–]asterias 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

For your information, the Greek equivalent of Fauci said that children don't spread the virus and don't need special protection. Which now everyone pretends that doesn't remember, as suddenly children need the vax as well.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

and the UK equivalent of Fauci said he and Fauci both tried to cover up the lab leak theory.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

There are several strains of the virus, the most recent of which (Omicron) does indeed spread to and among children, as one can see in the news. Research is updated regularly, so that it's now well-known that kids can indeed spread the virus.

[–]asterias 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

So all this research allowed them to develop an RNA "vaccine" in no time, yet didn't allow them to know whether children get sick or spread the flu.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

If I wish to remember these

Wait so you are admitting to not knowing what you are talking about. This is low pyramid.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

What?

It's low pyramid to respond to my helpful respose (you asked for examples; I provided them) by saying that I do not know what I am talking about. I said - if I want to remember these - which indicates that I previously knew of them.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Which misinfo bothers you the most? MSM says it's misinfo so you are blindly parroting them. That's the only way you could forget the details of a 1 week old story.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Your reference to low POD concerns me. I don't wish to continue the discussion.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Bad faith

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It's bad faith for an administrator to tell someone that their "wish to remember" (the requested information) is "low pyramid". I answered your prompt by providing the links with Rogan's misleading comments. That's operatig in good faith.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm sorry, I take it back. You provided quite the gish gallop... but it was better than nothing. The memory comment is just your new personal debate coach helping you to see your errors. On a small site like this, you can get the personal attention that you deserve.