The still-anonymous coward who murdered unarmed protester Ashlee Babbit has a new excuse: She wore a backpack.

submitted by wristaction from thegatewaypundit.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]wristaction[S] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

By the way, the anonymous officer - who is not being named, whose name hasn't "leaked", whose identity and background is not being sought in the name of public interest by the national news media and who is not expected to be prosecuted for aiming his gun at an unarmed, 110lb protester, firing and killing her - is clearly lying. He cannot claim to have seen her backpack and not seen the officers standing directly behind her.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

He cannot claim to have seen her backpack and not seen the officers standing directly behind her.

Hoax shootings are a licence for Police to claim whatever they want. They can change their story at any time.

The state will pay millions in civil damages against fraudulent claims with public tax money.

And the family will get paid tens of thousands from go fund me scams.

The entire charade is beyond absurd.
People may storm buildings if they have an objective.
There was no objective. The police let them enter.
It's a public building. What was the fake barricaded doors nonsense; as if there's a protected inner sanctum?

The narrative is beyond retarded.